From: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@redhat.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
JBeulich@novell.com, Olaf.Dabrunz@gmx.net,
Stefan Assmann <sassmann@redhat.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
lenb@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5 v2] x86: boot interrupt reroute fix
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 10:33:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101202153344.29125.86670.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
During the 2.6.29 merge parts of e1d3a90846b40ad3160bf4b648d36c6badad39ac got
lost because of other ACPI changes. This patchset gets the reroute code working
again with the current ACPI code. As suggested by Ingo Molnar the missing boot
interrupt reroute parts are re-added in separate files.
Therefore some smaller changes to the ACPI and PCI code are necessary to allow
the boot interrupt reroute code to access required structures and functionality.
In detail, the reroute code requires access to:
- struct acpi_prt_entry
- pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge()
Additionally to not change any information in the global acpi_prt_list it is
desirable to have acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry() return a pointer to a copy of
a struct acpi_prt_entry instead of pointer into the global acpi_prt_list. The
callers of acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry() have been updated to free the
allocated structure as well.
By request of Bjorn Helgaas I've created a bugzilla entry at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21882
to gather information about the boot interrupt reroute problem.
Jesse Barnes suggested to integrate the changes through the ACPI tree.
v2:
- split pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge() changes into separate patches
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-02 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-02 15:33 Stefan Assmann [this message]
2010-12-02 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5 v2] ACPI: move struct acpi_prt_entry to actbl1.h Stefan Assmann
2010-12-02 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5 v2] ACPI: make acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry return a copy of a prt_entry Stefan Assmann
2010-12-02 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] PCI: Add locking to pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge() Stefan Assmann
2010-12-02 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5 v2] PCI: Add header declaration for pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge() Stefan Assmann
2010-12-02 15:34 ` [PATCH 5/5 v2] PCI, ACPI: re-add boot interrupt reroute code in separate files Stefan Assmann
2010-12-09 15:19 ` [PATCH 0/5 v2] x86: boot interrupt reroute fix Stefan Assmann
2011-01-11 10:38 ` Stefan Assmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101202153344.29125.86670.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=sassmann@redhat.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=Olaf.Dabrunz@gmx.net \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox