public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Regression] GPEs being enabled inappropriately
@ 2010-12-10 17:55 Matthew Garrett
  2010-12-10 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2010-12-10 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-acpi; +Cc: rjw

I've just had a bug report from someone who's seeing high GPE-triggered 
load in .37. It turns out that GPEs 1B and 1E are constantly firing. 
Both have associated _L1B and _L1E methods, but they're also present in 
_PRW methods s should be disabled by default. However, part of the GPE 
rework means that we're now ignoring _PRW methods if the device they're 
associated with reports itself missing in _STA. I think we need to pay 
attention to _PRW regardless of whether or not the device is present, as 
otherwise we may be enabling GPEs that are tied to GPIOs that aren't 
connected to anything at the other end.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Regression] GPEs being enabled inappropriately
  2010-12-10 17:55 [Regression] GPEs being enabled inappropriately Matthew Garrett
@ 2010-12-10 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-12-10 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: linux-acpi

On Friday, December 10, 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I've just had a bug report from someone who's seeing high GPE-triggered 
> load in .37. It turns out that GPEs 1B and 1E are constantly firing. 
> Both have associated _L1B and _L1E methods, but they're also present in 
> _PRW methods s should be disabled by default. However, part of the GPE 
> rework means that we're now ignoring _PRW methods if the device they're 
> associated with reports itself missing in _STA. I think we need to pay 
> attention to _PRW regardless of whether or not the device is present, as 
> otherwise we may be enabling GPEs that are tied to GPIOs that aren't 
> connected to anything at the other end.

Below is a patch (untested) that I think should help in the majority of cases
(except for when there are devices with _PRW under the ones that are reported
to be inactive).

Thanks,
Rafael

---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |   96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -705,54 +705,84 @@ static int acpi_bus_get_perf_flags(struc
 }
 
 static acpi_status
-acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(struct acpi_device *device,
-					     union acpi_object *package)
+acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(acpi_handle handle,
+					     struct acpi_device_wakeup *wakeup)
 {
-	int i = 0;
+	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+	union acpi_object *package = NULL;
 	union acpi_object *element = NULL;
+	acpi_status status;
+	int i = 0;
 
-	if (!device || !package || (package->package.count < 2))
+	if (!wakeup)
 		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
 
+	/* _PRW */
+	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_PRW", NULL, &buffer);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PRW"));
+		return status;
+	}
+
+	package = (union acpi_object *)buffer.pointer;
+
+	if (!package || (package->package.count < 2)) {
+		status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	element = &(package->package.elements[0]);
-	if (!element)
-		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+	if (!element) {
+		status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+		goto out;
+	}
 	if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) {
 		if ((element->package.count < 2) ||
 		    (element->package.elements[0].type !=
 		     ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE)
-		    || (element->package.elements[1].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER))
-			return AE_BAD_DATA;
-		device->wakeup.gpe_device =
+		    || (element->package.elements[1].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)) {
+			status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+			goto out;
+		}
+		wakeup->gpe_device =
 		    element->package.elements[0].reference.handle;
-		device->wakeup.gpe_number =
+		wakeup->gpe_number =
 		    (u32) element->package.elements[1].integer.value;
 	} else if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
-		device->wakeup.gpe_number = element->integer.value;
-	} else
-		return AE_BAD_DATA;
+		wakeup->gpe_number = element->integer.value;
+	} else {
+		status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	element = &(package->package.elements[1]);
 	if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
-		return AE_BAD_DATA;
+		status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+		goto out;
 	}
-	device->wakeup.sleep_state = element->integer.value;
+	wakeup->sleep_state = element->integer.value;
 
 	if ((package->package.count - 2) > ACPI_MAX_HANDLES) {
-		return AE_NO_MEMORY;
+		status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
+		goto out;
 	}
-	device->wakeup.resources.count = package->package.count - 2;
-	for (i = 0; i < device->wakeup.resources.count; i++) {
+	wakeup->resources.count = package->package.count - 2;
+	for (i = 0; i < wakeup->resources.count; i++) {
 		element = &(package->package.elements[i + 2]);
-		if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE)
-			return AE_BAD_DATA;
+		if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) {
+			status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+			goto out;
+		}
 
-		device->wakeup.resources.handles[i] = element->reference.handle;
+		wakeup->resources.handles[i] = element->reference.handle;
 	}
 
-	acpi_gpe_can_wake(device->wakeup.gpe_device, device->wakeup.gpe_number);
+	acpi_gpe_can_wake(wakeup->gpe_device, wakeup->gpe_number);
 
-	return AE_OK;
+ out:
+	kfree(buffer.pointer);
+
+	return status;
 }
 
 static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -787,26 +817,15 @@ static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(
 static int acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	acpi_status status = 0;
-	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
-	union acpi_object *package = NULL;
 	int psw_error;
 
-	/* _PRW */
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle, "_PRW", NULL, &buffer);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-		ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PRW"));
-		goto end;
-	}
-
-	package = (union acpi_object *)buffer.pointer;
-	status = acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(device, package);
+	status = acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(device->handle,
+							      &device->wakeup);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Extracting _PRW package"));
 		goto end;
 	}
 
-	kfree(buffer.pointer);
-
 	device->wakeup.flags.valid = 1;
 	device->wakeup.prepare_count = 0;
 	acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(device);
@@ -1368,6 +1387,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
 	struct acpi_bus_ops *ops = context;
 	int type;
 	unsigned long long sta;
+	struct acpi_device_wakeup wakeup;
 	struct acpi_device *device;
 	acpi_status status;
 	int result;
@@ -1377,8 +1397,10 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
 		return AE_OK;
 
 	if (!(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT) &&
-	    !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING))
+	    !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING)) {
+		acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(handle, &wakeup);
 		return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * We may already have an acpi_device from a previous enumeration.  If

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-10 23:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-10 17:55 [Regression] GPEs being enabled inappropriately Matthew Garrett
2010-12-10 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox