From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] PCI: revert to allocating bottom-up, avoid E820 areas Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:03:21 -0800 Message-ID: <20101216140321.1a75ccef@jbarnes-desktop> References: <20101216173614.8185.19462.stgit@bob.kio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Len Brown , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Adam Belay List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:59:33 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Bjorn Helgaas = wrote: > > > > So I think the best band-aid for now is to revert to bottom-up allo= cation > > and do a better job of avoiding E820 reserved areas. =C2=A0Obviousl= y, it's not > > complete because we could still trip over ACPI devices (as in 23802= ), but > > that's a problem we've always had and it's not as likely if we go b= ottom-up. >=20 > Ok, ack for this series. Have we got testers for it? In particular, > have the people who have seen regressions been notified of this new > series? >=20 > That said, let's just try to merge it quickly so that we get maximal > coverage before the holiday season starts. Jesse, it makes sense > through your tree, but if you'd rather me take it directly, I can do > that. I'll pull it into my tree and send you a pull req tomorrow if that's ok. I have a couple of fixes besides this, but I have to drop Bjorn's earlier series... Thanks, --=20 Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center