public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Adam Belay <abelay@mit.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] x86: avoid high BIOS area when allocating address space
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:39:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101216173901.8185.56176.stgit@bob.kio> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101216173614.8185.19462.stgit@bob.kio>


This prevents allocation of the last 2MB before 4GB.

The experiment described here shows Windows 7 ignoring the last 1MB:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23542#c27

This patch ignores the top 2MB instead of just 1MB because H. Peter Anvin
says "There will be ROM at the top of the 32-bit address space; it's a fact
of the architecture, and on at least older systems it was common to have a
shadow 1 MiB below."

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
---

 arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h |    3 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/resource.c  |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h
index 5be1542..e99d55d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ struct e820map {
 #define BIOS_BEGIN		0x000a0000
 #define BIOS_END		0x00100000
 
+#define BIOS_ROM_BASE		0xffe00000
+#define BIOS_ROM_END		0xffffffff
+
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 /* see comment in arch/x86/kernel/e820.c */
 extern struct e820map e820;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c b/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c
index 89638af..2a26819 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c
@@ -37,10 +37,11 @@ static void remove_e820_regions(struct resource *avail)
 
 void arch_remove_reservations(struct resource *avail)
 {
-	/* Trim out BIOS area (low 1MB) and E820 regions */
+	/* Trim out BIOS areas (low 1MB and high 2MB) and E820 regions */
 	if (avail->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
 		if (avail->start < BIOS_END)
 			avail->start = BIOS_END;
+		resource_clip(avail, BIOS_ROM_BASE, BIOS_ROM_END);
 
 		remove_e820_regions(avail);
 	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-16 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-16 17:38 [PATCH 0/9] PCI: revert to allocating bottom-up, avoid E820 areas Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 17:38 ` [PATCH 1/9] Revert "PCI: fix pci_bus_alloc_resource() hang, prefer positive decode" Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 17:38 ` [PATCH 2/9] Revert "x86: allocate space within a region top-down" Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 17:38 ` [PATCH 3/9] Revert "x86/PCI: allocate space from the end of a region, not the beginning" Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 17:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] Revert "PCI: allocate bus resources from the top down" Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 17:38 ` [PATCH 5/9] Revert "resources: support allocating space within a region " Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 17:38 ` [PATCH 6/9] resources: add arch hook for preventing allocation in reserved areas Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 22:03   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-16 22:56     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 23:17       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-16 17:38 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86: avoid low BIOS area when allocating address space Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 17:38 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: avoid E820 regions " Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-19  9:50   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-19 23:33     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-16 17:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2010-12-16 21:59 ` [PATCH 0/9] PCI: revert to allocating bottom-up, avoid E820 areas Linus Torvalds
2010-12-16 22:03   ` Jesse Barnes
2010-12-17  3:00   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 16:00   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-12-19 14:31     ` David John

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101216173901.8185.56176.stgit@bob.kio \
    --to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=abelay@mit.edu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox