From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: suspend hangs at platform phase [was: mmotm 2010-12-23-16-58 uploaded] Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 16:45:28 +0100 Message-ID: <201101061645.28968.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <201012240132.oBO1W8Ub022207@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <201101060028.43342.rjw@sisk.pl> <4D258A55.2040003@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D258A55.2040003@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Slaby Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Linux-pm mailing list , "Brown, Len" , steiner@sgi.com, ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, January 06, 2011, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 01/06/2011 12:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Two more questions: > > (1) Does the failing machine power off correctly with the kernel that fails to > > suspend? > > Poweroff is OK. > > > (2) Is the failing suspend behavior reproducible if you run > > "echo disk > /sys/power/state" instead of "pm-suspend" in the platform test? > > Thanks for the hint no_console_suspend with hibernate shows somwthing > (opposing to suspend). I've sent a patch for the oops which occured due > to ioremap change. Can you send a link to the patch, please? > The ioremap change still needs to be reverted, obviously. Does it need to be reverted with your patch applied too? Rafael