From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: don't attempt to use hest_tab unless !acpi_pci_disabled
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:48:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201101152148.43791.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110115124242.4f9ae65d@queued.net>
On Saturday, January 15, 2011, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:38:10 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, January 15, 2011, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:01:18 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Saturday, January 15, 2011, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:24:27 -0500 (EST)
> > > > > Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > This patch causes apei_hest_parse to check both
> > > > > > > hest_disabled and acpi_pci_disabled before continuing.
> > > > > > > With it, the XO-1 boots properly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The X0-1 has no ACPI support, and thus you are running
> > > > > > with acpi_disabled=1, yes?
> > > > >
> > > > > The XO-1 has no ACPI support, but ACPI support is enabled in the
> > > > > kernel (as the XO-1.5 does have ACPI support, and the same
> > > > > kernel is used between both) and I'm not passing any arguments
> > > > > to the kernel regarding it. The kernel's ACPI code detects that
> > > > > it's not there and disables it (the kernel message that's seen
> > > > > is "ACPI: Interpreter disabled.")
> > > > >
> > > > > This is what sets apci_pci_disabled to 1; I'm not doing it
> > > > > manually.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm. Does the appended patch help instead?
> > >
> > > Nope. acpi_hest_init returns immediately if acpi_disabled, and thus
> > > never sets hest_disable. You either need to set hest_disable, or
> > > ensure apei_hest_parse checks more than just hest_disable.
> >
> > OK, so the new one below should help, right?
>
> Yes, that looks better
OK
> (though you probably just want to use 'goto err;' instead).
Indeed.
> I can test it later today.
Cool, thanks. Please try the version below with the 'goto'.
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c | 6 +++---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -631,11 +631,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_remove(struct a
static int __init acpi_pci_root_init(void)
{
+ acpi_hest_init();
+
if (acpi_pci_disabled)
return 0;
- acpi_hest_init();
-
pci_acpi_crs_quirks();
if (acpi_bus_register_driver(&acpi_pci_root_driver) < 0)
return -ENODEV;
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
@@ -201,14 +201,14 @@ void __init acpi_hest_init(void)
int rc = -ENODEV;
unsigned int ghes_count = 0;
- if (acpi_disabled)
- return;
-
if (hest_disable) {
pr_info(HEST_PFX "Table parsing disabled.\n");
return;
}
+ if (acpi_disabled)
+ goto err;
+
status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_HEST, 0,
(struct acpi_table_header **)&hest_tab);
if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-15 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110114181620.188e7a62@queued.net>
2011-01-15 4:24 ` [PATCH] ACPI: don't attempt to use hest_tab unless !acpi_pci_disabled Len Brown
2011-01-15 7:54 ` Andres Salomon
2011-01-15 13:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-01-15 20:32 ` Andres Salomon
2011-01-15 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-01-15 20:42 ` Andres Salomon
2011-01-15 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-01-16 3:24 ` Andres Salomon
2011-01-16 19:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201101152148.43791.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox