From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: [PATCH, resend] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:19:21 +0100 Message-ID: <201101191019.21299.trenn@suse.de> References: <4D36B581020000780002D0FF@vpn.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55238 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752736Ab1ASJTX (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 04:19:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D36B581020000780002D0FF@vpn.id2.novell.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, Tejun Heo , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 09:57:21 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > In order to be able to suppress the use of SRAT tables that 32-bit > Linux can't deal with (in one case known to lead to a non-bootable > system, unless disabling ACPI altogether), move the "numa=" option > handling to common code. As this does not only unify the numa_32/64.c code a bit, but is also needed for being able to boot a machine, it looks like a candidate for 2.6.38-rcX. Reviewed-by: Thomas Renninger Thomas