From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC] merge 32/64 bits realmode wakeup code Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:59:18 +0100 Message-ID: <201101301359.18869.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <4D41EA12.1030402@free.fr> <201101292215.57292.rjw@sisk.pl> <4D44AE75.6020803@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50022 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753744Ab1A3NAC (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:00:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D44AE75.6020803@zytor.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: matthieu castet , Linux Kernel list , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org On Sunday, January 30, 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/29/2011 01:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > That's correct, but those changes can wait. The most urgent thing is to fix > > the resume regression at hand. I guess we should ask the reporter's in > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27472 to test that patch, right? > > > > By the way, guys: I'm on vacation at the moment, but I do monitor this > thread. I think at this point we should revert NX for the low 1 MiB and > worry about doing it properly for .39. Fine by me, this is your call anyway. > That being said, this kind of unification is a good thing in general. Sure. Thanks, Rafael