From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86, acpi: Handle xapic/x2apic entries in MADT at same time Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:24:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20110131122447.GA30149@elte.hu> References: <4D423360.6080408@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46050 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752452Ab1AaMZR (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:25:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D423360.6080408@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Yinghai Lu , Len Brown Cc: Len Brown , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Suresh Siddha , Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Andrew Morton * Yinghai Lu wrote: > > One system have mixing xapic and x2apic entries in MADT and SRAT. > BIOS guys insist that ACPI 4.0 SPEC said so, if apic id < 255, even > the cpus are with x2apic mode pre-enabled, still need to use xapic entries > instead of x2apic entries. > > on 8 socket system with x2apic pre-enabled, will get out of order sequence: > CPU0: socket0, core0, thread0. > CPU1 - CPU 40: socket 4 - socket 7, thread 0 > CPU41 - CPU 80: socket 4 - socket 7, thread 1 > CPU81 - CPU 119: socket 0 - socket 3, thread 0 > CPU120 - CPU 159: socket 0 - socket 3, thread 1 > > so max_cpus=80 will not get all thread0 now. > > Need to handle every entry in MADT at same time with xapic and x2apic. > so we can honor sequence in MADT. > > We can use max_cpus= command line to use thread0 in every core, > because recent MADT always have all thread0 at first. > Also it could make the cpu to node mapping more sane. > > after patch will get > CPU0 - CPU 79: socket 0 - socket 7, thread 0 > CPU80 - CPU 159: socket 0 - socket 7, thread 1 > > -v2: update some comments, and change to pass array pointer. > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > > --- > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++------- > drivers/acpi/numa.c | 16 +++++++++--- > drivers/acpi/tables.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > include/linux/acpi.h | 9 ++++++ > 4 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) Seems useful - we can queue it up and can get it tested in the x86 tree if Len acks the principle and the ACPI approach. Thanks, Ingo