From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH wq#for-2.6.39] workqueue: add
 system_freezeable_wq
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:14:53 +0100
Message-ID: <20110208151453.GC6558@htj.dyndns.org>
References: <20110208094155.GB6558@htj.dyndns.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1102081008180.2100-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1102081008180.2100-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:10:46AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> > From de62c151df9b6568c67977920267392c432f340a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:39:03 +0100
> > 
> > Add system wide freezeable workqueue.
> 
> The preferred spelling is "freezable".

Hmmm... workqueue always has used freezeable (even before cmwq
changes).  It seems like mass renaming is in order.  :-(

Thanks.

-- 
tejun