From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: add error return when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK is not set Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:40:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20110408064055.GA14602@elte.hu> References: <20110225180634.017570095@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> <20110227120949.GF16453@elte.hu> <20110227121518.GA19165@elte.hu> <4D6AFBB0.70401@kernel.org> <4D6BF63D.2020404@sgi.com> <4D6BFF46.3050001@sgi.com> <4D93CDD7.8000708@sgi.com> <4D9E13D4.3080702@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D9E13D4.3080702@sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Travis Cc: Yinghai Lu , David Rientjes , Jack Steiner , Robin Holt , Len Brown , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Linus Torvalds List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org * Mike Travis wrote: > Was there any further objections to these patches? No big objections that i remember - so assuming review feedback has been addressed please send the latest and greatest in a new thread, this one is getting a bit deep :-) Thanks, Ingo