From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] ACPI: pci_irq, add PRT_ quirk for IBM Bartolo Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:56:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20110412085622.43488ed9@jbarnes-desktop> References: <4C87A62E.30108@gmail.com> <1302598086-3622-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1302598086-3622-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Slaby Cc: jirislaby@gmail.com, Robert Hancock , mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:48:06 +0200 Jiri Slaby wrote: > On IBM Bartolo machines, cards in 00:09.0 are defunct (if use > interrupts). DSDT says that this slot (with function 0, i.e. pin A) is > routed to \_SB_.PCI0.PIB_.LNKB. But it's not, it's wired to LNKC, so > interrupts are misrouted. Add a quirk for this to workaround the > issue. > > References: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595683 > References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18092 > > --- > Hi, > > as Robert Hancock suggested at: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/7/206 > > I reported this in bugzilla (the link above). But I got only replies > requesting another infos which I provided. Could anybody look into > the bug and confirm whether this patch is correct or not. And if yes, > could you apply that? I'll defer to the ACPI experts, Len or Matthew have you checked this one out? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center