From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
"Jarosz, Sebastian" <sebastian.jarosz@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch]acpi: add missing _OSI strings -- resend
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:08:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110705150853.53e00c17.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309757000.15392.221.camel@sli10-conroe>
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:23:20 +0800
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> Last post (Jun 14 ) is lost, resend.
>
>
> Linux supports some optional features, but it should notify BIOS about them
> in _OSI method. Currently Linux doesn't notify any, which might make such
> features not work because BIOS doesn't know about them.
>
This is a bit vague. Are any machines actually fixed or improved by
this change? Is so, can we please see a full description of the
behaviour change?
Thanks.
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -1083,7 +1083,13 @@ struct osi_setup_entry {
> bool enable;
> };
>
> -static struct osi_setup_entry __initdata osi_setup_entries[OSI_STRING_ENTRIES_MAX];
> +static struct osi_setup_entry __initdata
> + osi_setup_entries[OSI_STRING_ENTRIES_MAX] = {
> + {"Module Device", true},
> + {"Processor Device", true},
> + {"3.0 _SCP Extensions", true},
> + {"Processor Aggregator Device", true},
> +};
>
> void __init acpi_osi_setup(char *str)
> {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-05 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-04 5:23 [patch]acpi: add missing _OSI strings -- resend Shaohua Li
2011-07-04 13:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-07-05 22:08 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-07-06 0:29 ` Shaohua Li
2011-07-06 12:50 ` Jarosz, Sebastian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110705150853.53e00c17.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.jarosz@intel.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox