* [PATCH] ACPI: Ensure thermal limits match CPU frequencies
@ 2011-08-29 18:28 Matthew Garrett
2011-08-30 14:03 ` Josh Boyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2011-08-29 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi; +Cc: lenb, rui.zhang, jboyer, Matthew Garrett
The ACPI thermal management code supports slowing down a CPU when it's
overheating. Right now that's done by choosing to run it at 100%, 75%, 50%
or 25% of full speed. However, most CPUs do not allow an arbitrary
frequency to be set and so will run at the first frequency below that value.
This doesn't match the intent of the specification, which is to drop the
frequency state by state until the temperature stabalises. Fix this up
so it uses actual frequencies rather than percentages.
Reported by: Gene Snider <snider6982@comcast.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
index 870550d..1c4eb60 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
@@ -52,10 +52,8 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_thermal");
* _any_ cpufreq driver and not only the acpi-cpufreq driver.
*/
-#define CPUFREQ_THERMAL_MIN_STEP 0
-#define CPUFREQ_THERMAL_MAX_STEP 3
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, cpufreq_thermal_limit_state);
static unsigned int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init = 0;
static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -70,19 +68,19 @@ static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long event, void *data)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
- unsigned long max_freq = 0;
+ int state = per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_limit_state, policy->cpu);
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST)
- goto out;
+ return 0;
+
+ table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
- max_freq = (
- policy->cpuinfo.max_freq *
- (100 - per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, policy->cpu) * 20)
- ) / 100;
+ if (!table)
+ return 0;
- cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq);
+ cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, table[state].frequency);
- out:
return 0;
}
@@ -92,10 +90,21 @@ static struct notifier_block acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block = {
static int cpufreq_get_max_state(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ int count = 0;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
+
if (!cpu_has_cpufreq(cpu))
return 0;
- return CPUFREQ_THERMAL_MAX_STEP;
+ table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(cpu);
+
+ if (!table)
+ return 0;
+
+ while (table[count].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END)
+ count++;
+
+ return count;
}
static int cpufreq_get_cur_state(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -103,7 +112,7 @@ static int cpufreq_get_cur_state(unsigned int cpu)
if (!cpu_has_cpufreq(cpu))
return 0;
- return per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, cpu);
+ return per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_limit_state, cpu);
}
static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int state)
@@ -111,7 +120,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int state)
if (!cpu_has_cpufreq(cpu))
return 0;
- per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, cpu) = state;
+ per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_limit_state, cpu) = state;
cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
return 0;
}
@@ -122,7 +131,7 @@ void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++)
if (cpu_present(i))
- per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, i) = 0;
+ per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_limit_state, i) = 0;
i = cpufreq_register_notifier(&acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block,
CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
@@ -170,15 +179,11 @@ int acpi_processor_get_limit_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
return 0;
}
-/* thermal coolign device callbacks */
+/* thermal cooling device callbacks */
static int acpi_processor_max_state(struct acpi_processor *pr)
{
int max_state = 0;
- /*
- * There exists four states according to
- * cpufreq_thermal_reduction_ptg. 0, 1, 2, 3
- */
max_state += cpufreq_get_max_state(pr->id);
if (pr->flags.throttling)
max_state += (pr->throttling.state_count -1);
--
1.7.6.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Ensure thermal limits match CPU frequencies
2011-08-29 18:28 [PATCH] ACPI: Ensure thermal limits match CPU frequencies Matthew Garrett
@ 2011-08-30 14:03 ` Josh Boyer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Josh Boyer @ 2011-08-30 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: linux-acpi, lenb, rui.zhang
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:28:27PM -0400, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The ACPI thermal management code supports slowing down a CPU when it's
> overheating. Right now that's done by choosing to run it at 100%, 75%, 50%
> or 25% of full speed. However, most CPUs do not allow an arbitrary
> frequency to be set and so will run at the first frequency below that value.
> This doesn't match the intent of the specification, which is to drop the
> frequency state by state until the temperature stabalises. Fix this up
> so it uses actual frequencies rather than percentages.
>
> Reported by: Gene Snider <snider6982@comcast.net>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> index 870550d..1c4eb60 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> @@ -52,10 +52,8 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_thermal");
> * _any_ cpufreq driver and not only the acpi-cpufreq driver.
> */
>
> -#define CPUFREQ_THERMAL_MIN_STEP 0
> -#define CPUFREQ_THERMAL_MAX_STEP 3
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, cpufreq_thermal_limit_state);
> static unsigned int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init = 0;
>
> static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
> @@ -70,19 +68,19 @@ static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> unsigned long event, void *data)
> {
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
> - unsigned long max_freq = 0;
> + int state = per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_limit_state, policy->cpu);
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
>
> if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST)
> - goto out;
> + return 0;
> +
> + table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
If CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=m and CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y, you'll get a
link error for an undefined symbol on this. This requires
ACPI_PROCESSOR to select CPU_FREQ_TABLE.
josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-30 14:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-29 18:28 [PATCH] ACPI: Ensure thermal limits match CPU frequencies Matthew Garrett
2011-08-30 14:03 ` Josh Boyer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox