From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: PME via interrupt or SCI mechanism? Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:40:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20110929014019.GA6144@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20110912171003.GA7939@xanatos> <201109272254.47232.rjw@sisk.pl> <20110927235216.GA5765@xanatos> <201109290021.28407.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:43371 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753724Ab1I2BkZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:40:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201109290021.28407.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Sarah Sharp , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:21:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Moreover, evidently, the event is signaled and it causes pci_acpi_wake_dev() > to be called for multiple devices, _except_ for the xhci_hcd. Perhaps > the notifier is not installed for that device for some reason. I suspect that we're just going to end up accepting defeat and having to poll *all* pci devices (including pcie) once a second. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org