From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: [RFH] Power Management mini-summit during the Kernel Summit 2011 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:11:21 +0200 Message-ID: <201110122211.21638.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:36614 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752167Ab1JLUJB (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:09:01 -0400 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Linux PM list , mark gross Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , ACPI Devel Mailing List , "Len Brown (Intel)" , Magnus Damm , Matthew Garrett , Arjan van de Ven , Tejun Heo , jean.pihet@newoldbits.com, Kevin Hilman , Daniel Drake , ming.lei@canonical.com, Grant Likely , Mark Brown , John Stultz Hi All, There was a plan to organize a PM mini-summit during the KS 2011 in Prague, but then I didn't follow up (which obviously is my fault) and lost track of things when kernel.org and the KS servers went offline. So, apparently, the KS organizers concluded that the PM mini-summit wasn't going to happen after all and didn't add it to the schedule. Still, it appears to be possible to arrange a room for a PM meeting on Sunday, Oct 23, if there are people wanting to attend. So, if you'd like to take part in such a meeting, please let me know ASAP. The topics I, personally, would like to discuss include: - Per-device PM QoS - Propagation of wakeup events to user space vs system suspend - Possibility of representing dependencies between devices through "device links" (i.e. objects representing master-slave links between devices) - Idea of common "platform" bus type that may cover ACPI devices (like battery, fans etc.), PNP devices and current platform devices in a consistent way - Freezer improvements Thanks, Rafael