From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [RFH] Power Management mini-summit during the Kernel Summit 2011 Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:20:17 -0600 Message-ID: <20111016042017.GA4901@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <201110122211.21638.rjw@sisk.pl> <201110132333.11849.rjw@sisk.pl> <20111013223543.GA28726@ponder.secretlab.ca> <201110160035.34980.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:57269 "EHLO mail-pz0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750765Ab1JPEUU (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2011 00:20:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201110160035.34980.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Greg KH , Linux PM list , Daniel Drake , mark gross , ACPI Devel Mailing List , "Len Brown (Intel)" , Magnus Damm , Matthew Garrett , Arjan van de Ven , Tejun Heo , jean.pihet@newoldbits.com, Kevin Hilman , ming.lei@canonical.com, Mark Brown , John Stultz , Chris Ball On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:35:34AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, October 14, 2011, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:33:11PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 13, 2011, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:55:39PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > > > > Is there a schedule available yet for the presentations on Tuesday for kernel summit? > > > > > > > > We just finalized it yesterday, but I don't think anyone has made it > > > > public. I'll go ask... > > > > > > It looks like a key-signing party is scheduled at 16:30 and then there's > > > the evening event with buses leaving at 18:15 (most likely). So there > > > seems to be some free time between 5 PM and 6 PM. I wonder if that's > > > going to be sufficient? > > > > Ugh; please don't do that. There is no way it will be sufficient > > time, it will make everything rushed, and we'll all be mostly burnt > > out by then anyway. > > In that case I don't think we can find any suitable time frame at all, > at least not right now. Send me this list of topics that you have. Some of them are relevant to the ARM community, and we can fit them into the ARM workshop which your are more than welcome to attend. g.