From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Regression in 3.1 causes Xen to use wrong idle routine Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:48:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20111026134843.GA31609@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <4EA7DFD1.9060608@canonical.com> <20111026133003.GA6654@phenom.dumpdata.com> <4EA80CF2.5040309@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:44980 "EHLO acsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932680Ab1JZNsz (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:48:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EA80CF2.5040309@canonical.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Bader Cc: len.brown@intel.com, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" > > What about using the cpuidle_disabled() functionality and adhere to that? > > As so: > > .. snip.. > > >From reading over it, this should work. Though I would be interested to hear > from the linux-acpi folks. Also to double check that calling pm_idle when > cpuidle.off was specified really is what is intended. Oh yeah, definitly need the input from linux-acpi folks. And also to be actually tested :-)