From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: ACPI & PM patch queue for Linux 3.2 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 01:16:24 +0100 Message-ID: <201111080116.25161.trenn@suse.de> References: <1320639124-16178-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53149 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750871Ab1KHAQ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:16:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1320639124-16178-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, ming.m.lin@intel.com On Monday 07 November 2011 05:11:50 Len Brown wrote: .. > Also, due to kernel.org taking my e-mail and patchwork out > of action, i've missed quite a bit of e-mail, so feel > free to ping/re-send patches I've missed. Any chance the two I posted: Subjet: Override arbitrary ACPI tables via initrd Date: Fri, 04-11-11 can make it? One patch is in ACPICA, but it's nicely separated. Robert and Lin agreed with it, but seem to lack time to convert it to ACPICA sources: If it's not in ACPICA could it still get into Linus' and reverted and synced with acpica in 3.3 or similar? Thanks, Thomas