From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:59:18 -0800 Message-ID: <20111121215918.febd9fd4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <201111212249.31196.rjw@sisk.pl> <4ECB37E4.6020204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4ECB37E4.6020204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Linux SCSI List , Linux ACPI , Network Development , Linux Wireless List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI , Florian Mickler , Linux PM List , Kernel Testers List , Linus Torvalds , Maciej Rutecki List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:19:24 +0530 "Srivatsa S. Bhat" wrote: > > Subject : khugepaged blocks suspend2ram (3.2.0-rc1-00252-g8f042aa) > > Submitter : Sergei Trofimovich > > Date : 2011-11-12 10:48 > > Message-ID : 20111112104859.7744b282@sf.home > > References : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/12/11 > > > > Andrea's patch already fixes this issue, which was reported first by > Jiri Slaby. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/11/93 > I remember Andrew Morton taking this patch in his -mm tree. But it is > not in mainline yet. So can we consider this closed or not? grr, nothing in that patch's changelog indicates that it fixed a regression nor that it fixed an infinite blockage of suspend. I moved it to my 3.2 queue, thanks.