From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per package instead of per CPU Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:21:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20111227212126.GF11715@one.firstfloor.org> References: <1324967687-10559-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1324967687-10559-5-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20111227164323.GA23245@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:41693 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751276Ab1L0VVa (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:21:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111227164323.GA23245@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Andi Kleen , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:43:24PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:34:47PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > + if (reduction_pctg(policy->cpu)) > > + printk("cpufreq notifier %ld\n", event); > > + > > Needed? No, i'll drop it. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.