From: Holger Macht <holger@homac.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] acpi/libata: Express dependencies for devices on dock stations and bays
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:00:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120121140048.GA15111@homac.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327154100.11421.5.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
On Sat 21. Jan - 07:55:00, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 01:23 +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
> > On Fr 20. Jan - 01:18:18, Holger Macht wrote:
> > > Patches 2 through 5 are just a refresh of the patches from Matthew
> > > Garrett sent to this list in September 2010 [1]:
> >
> > I successfully faked the sender of the patches from Matthew (now it
> > looks as they were sent by him) due to the use wrong use of git
> > format-patch. Sorry for that, really wasn't intended. Hope this is not a
> > problem.
>
> Actually, it is; the way you sent them the first time: From: in the
> body is the correct way. If you go about faking the sender, you're
> likely to get rejected as spam if people do SPF checking. Plus it's a
> bit confusing for maintainers because I'd really like to know who sent
> the patch to verify the signoff chain.
Sure, I rather meant this like "hope it's not a problem this one
time". It was by plain mistake because my mutt took the "From:" header
as it should and I didn't notice. I also don't want people to send mails
in my name, that's what the apology actually was for, directed to
Matthew.
>
> Other than this, it looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Holger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-21 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 0:18 [PATCHv2 0/7] acpi/libata: Express dependencies for devices on dock stations and bays Holger Macht
2012-01-20 0:23 ` Holger Macht
2012-01-21 13:55 ` James Bottomley
2012-01-21 14:00 ` Holger Macht [this message]
2012-02-09 6:46 ` Lin Ming
2012-02-09 7:33 ` Holger Macht
2012-02-09 15:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-03-27 8:11 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-02 9:22 ` Holger Macht
2012-04-02 15:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-04-02 16:43 ` Holger Macht
2012-04-02 17:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-04-02 18:39 ` Holger Macht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120121140048.GA15111@homac.suse.de \
--to=holger@homac.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox