From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI-Thermal: Add a 'flag' argument in thermal.c Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:23:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20120126162320.GA15099@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1327595749-17673-1-git-send-email-durgadoss.r@intel.com> <1327595749-17673-2-git-send-email-durgadoss.r@intel.com> <20120126134256.GA11017@srcf.ucam.org> <4D68720C2E767A4AA6A8796D42C8EB5902F813@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:54434 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753034Ab2AZQXZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:23:25 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D68720C2E767A4AA6A8796D42C8EB5902F813@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "R, Durgadoss" Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "Zhang, Rui" On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:14:39PM +0000, R, Durgadoss wrote: > I thought through this.. But there are few drivers in > drivers/platform/x86/, that use these calls. In that case, > how will we merge them ? > > Is it ok If I send 'one' patch which includes both ACPI and > Platform driver(s) changes ? Yes. Send one patch that updates the API and callers simultaneously. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org