From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: ke.yu@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
lenb@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, jeremy@goop.org,
konrad@kernel.org, stefan.bader@canonical.com,
Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, mike.mcclurg@citrix.com,
liang.tang@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] ACPI: add processor driver for Xen virtual CPUs.
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:18:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120210171838.GB25046@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322673664-14642-6-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> + if (pr->id == -1) {
> + int device_declaration;
> + int apic_id = -1;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(device), ACPI_PROCESSOR_OBJECT_HID))
> + device_declaration = 0;
> + else
> + device_declaration = 1;
> +
> + apic_id = acpi_get_cpuid(pr->handle,
> + device_declaration, pr->acpi_id);
> + if (apic_id == -1) {
> + /* Processor is not present in MADT table */
So I was struggling to find an easy way to make the cases below (where
VCPU != physical CPU) work with using the driver that iterates over the
'processor' and was mystified to why it would not work, even with this
patchset. Found out that the acpi_get_cpuid does this:
201 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
202 for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
203 if (cpu_physical_id(i) == apic_id)
204 return i;
205 }
and since not-online vCPUs (so dom0_max_vcpus) are not in the "possible"
bitmask, we never get to check line 203 and end up returning -1 for
offline/not-present/not-possible vCPUs.
Which means that we end up here:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
instead of going through the pr->id = 0.
By the end of this, the information that the hypervisor gets is
actually limited to the amount of CPUs that we specified in dom0_max_vcpus=
> + /*
> + * It's possible to have pr->id as '-1' even when it's actually
> + * present in MADT table, e.g. due to limiting dom0 max vcpus
> + * less than physical present number. In such case we still want
> + * to parse ACPI processor object information, so mimic the
> + * pr->id to CPU-0. This should be safe because we only care
> + * about raw ACPI information, which only relies on pr->acpi_id.
> + * For other information relying on pr->id and gathered through
> + * SMP function call, it's safe to let them run on CPU-0 since
> + * underlying Xen will collect them. Only a valid pr->id can
> + * make later invocations forward progress.
> + */
> + pr->id = 0;
> + }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-30 17:20 [RFC PATCH] Exporting ACPI Pxx/Cxx states to other kernel subsystems (v1) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-30 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/8] ACPI: processor: export necessary interfaces Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-16 21:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-19 5:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-12-19 14:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-30 17:20 ` [PATCH 2/8] ACPI: processor: cache acpi_power_register in cx structure Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-30 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/8] ACPI: processor: add __acpi_processor_[un]register_driver helpers Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-16 22:03 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-19 5:48 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-12-19 14:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-20 2:29 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-12-20 15:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-21 0:35 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-12-23 3:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-26 1:31 ` Tian, Kevin
2012-01-03 20:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-06 1:07 ` Tian, Kevin
2012-01-13 22:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-17 3:03 ` Tian, Kevin
2012-01-17 17:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-17 18:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-23 16:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-30 17:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] ACPI: processor: Don't setup cpu idle driver and handler when we do not want them Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-16 21:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-19 10:33 ` liang tang
2011-12-19 14:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-20 6:25 ` liang tang
2011-11-30 17:21 ` [PATCH 5/8] ACPI: add processor driver for Xen virtual CPUs Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-01 9:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2011-12-12 17:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-13 7:45 ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-13 9:26 ` liang tang
2011-12-16 22:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-10 17:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-11-30 17:21 ` [PATCH 6/8] ACPI: processor: override the interface of register acpi processor handler for Xen vcpu Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-30 17:21 ` [PATCH 7/8] ACPI: xen processor: add PM notification interfaces Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-30 17:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] ACPI: xen processor: set ignore_ppc to handle PPC event for Xen vcpu Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120210171838.GB25046@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ke.yu@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=liang.tang@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.mcclurg@citrix.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).