linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.og>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ACPI: D3cold state is always valid
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:51:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204191351.41875.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC=cRTMts3q4s2qYr0Ds3W98WhXXXMa8P2qCAqm-fQcT+HFfDw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, April 19, 2012, huang ying wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, huang ying wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> wrote:
> >> > ACPI_STATE_D3 actually means ACPI D3hot which is not always valid.
> >> > Instead, ACPI D3cold is always valid.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c |   11 ++---------
> >> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> > index 767e2dc..fb56388 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> > @@ -884,13 +884,6 @@ static int acpi_bus_get_power_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
> >> >                                acpi_bus_add_power_resource(ps->resources.handles[j]);
> >> >                }
> >> >
> >> > -               /* The exist of _PR3 indicates D3Cold support */
> >> > -               if (i == ACPI_STATE_D3) {
> >> > -                       status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, object_name, &handle);
> >> > -                       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> >> > -                               device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD].flags.valid = 1;
> >> > -               }
> >> > -
> >> >                /* Evaluate "_PSx" to see if we can do explicit sets */
> >> >                object_name[2] = 'S';
> >> >                status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, object_name, &handle);
> >> > @@ -908,8 +901,8 @@ static int acpi_bus_get_power_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
> >> >        /* Set defaults for D0 and D3 states (always valid) */
> >> >        device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D0].flags.valid = 1;
> >> >        device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D0].power = 100;
> >> > -       device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D3].flags.valid = 1;
> >> > -       device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D3].power = 0;
> >> > +       device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD].flags.valid = 1;
> >> > +       device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD].power = 0;
> >> >
> >> >        acpi_bus_init_power(device);
> >>
> >> I think D3_HOT should be always valid, while D3_COLD should be valid
> >> for some situation.
> >
> > This need not be PCI, mind you.
> >
> >>  - has _PS3, no _PR3
> >>    - support D3_HOT, D3_COLD
> >
> > Nope.  D3_HOT cannot be supported in that case at the ACPI level.
> >
> >>    - set state
> >>      - D3_HOT: do nothing in ACPI
> >
> > That is not D3_HOT, then, from the ACPI point of view.  It is a different
> > power state.
> >
> > Suppose you have a non-PCI device that can be only power-manageable via ACPI
> > and that device has only _PS0 and _PS3.  How would you put it into D3_HOT,
> > in particular?
> 
> Normally, we will put it into D3_COLD (via _PS3).
> 
> If it is prevented to be put in D3_COLD,
>   - If D3_HOT is not marked as supported, we will keep it in D0
>   - otherwise, we advocate we put it into D3_HOT, but in fact, it is in D0.
> 
> The result is same, but with wrong name.
> 
> But there will be some real problem if we have something like CPU
> governor.  Because governor may choose D3_HOT for device.

In that case the ACPI layer should simply return an error code indicating
that the requested state is not available _from_ _it_.  If there are
more layers, however, they may be able to change the power state of
the device.

> But for PCI device, D3_HOT is supported for the device.

Yes, if the device supports native PM.  However, PCI D-states and ACPI D-states
are different things.  We kind of combine them in our PCI bus type.

> So the bus layer should combine the information from native power
> state supported and ACPI power state supported to determine which
> power states are supported?

Yes, we do that all the time, with the exception of D3 cold/hot.

> For example, for a PCI device, ACPI advocates D0 and D3_COLD are supported,
> and PCI layer may advocate D0, D3_HOT and D3_COLD are supported.

Exactly.  All of the available power states of the device depend on both
the device's own capabilities (ie. what PCI D-states the device may be
programmed into by register writes) and whatever is available from ACPI.

On embedded systems there are other factors as well.

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-19 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-17  5:47 [PATCH 0/6]: ACPI D3 state cleanup Lin Ming
2012-04-17  5:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] ACPI: D3cold state is always valid Lin Ming
2012-04-17  6:03   ` huang ying
2012-04-18 21:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-19  1:35       ` huang ying
2012-04-19 11:51         ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-04-19 15:23           ` Lin Ming
2012-04-19 20:39             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-17 20:29   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-18  2:15     ` Lin Ming
2012-04-18  2:32       ` Lin Ming
2012-04-18  9:09         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-17  5:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] ACPI: Set D3cold state as default device sleep state Lin Ming
2012-04-17  5:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] ACPI: Set D3cold state as default inferred state Lin Ming
2012-04-17  5:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI: Fix power resource's device power state when it's off Lin Ming
2012-04-17  5:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI/ACPI: Map PCI D3cold state to ACPI D3cold state Lin Ming
2012-04-17  5:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] ACPI: Rename ACPI_STATE_D3 to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT Lin Ming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201204191351.41875.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=aaron.lu@amd.com \
    --cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.og \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).