public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Andiry Xu <andiry.xu@amd.com>, Alex He <alex.he@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: evaluate _PS3 when entering D3 Cold
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:50:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204232150.57812.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120423151327.GA4019@fedora>

On Monday, April 23, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:43:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, April 23, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael and Ming,
> > > 
> > > Do you have any more comments on this patch?
> > > If not, can I have your ack? Thanks.
> > > 
> > > -Aaron
> > > 
> > > On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:18:30AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > > When entering D3 Cold from a higher device state, evaluate _PS3 first
> > > > and then make the proper power transition.
> > > > This is used to solve the ZPODD problem on AMD's platform, _PS3 on such
> > > > platforms will power off the ODD device and thus make the device enter
> > > > D3 cold state.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
> > > > Cc: Andiry Xu <andiry.xu@amd.com>
> > > > Cc: Alex He <alex.he@amd.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/acpi/bus.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > > > index 3263b68..68e593f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > > > @@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> > > >  	int result = 0;
> > > >  	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> > > >  	char object_name[5] = { '_', 'P', 'S', '0' + state, '\0' };
> > > > +	struct acpi_device_power_state *ps;
> > > > +	u8 explicit_set;
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (!device || (state < ACPI_STATE_D0) || (state > ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD))
> > > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > > @@ -239,7 +241,8 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> > > >  		return 0;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (!device->power.states[state].flags.valid) {
> > > > +	ps = &device->power.states[state];
> > > > +	if (!ps->flags.valid) {
> > > >  		printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "Device does not support D%d\n", state);
> > > >  		return -ENODEV;
> > > >  	}
> > > > @@ -263,7 +266,7 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> > > >  			if (result)
> > > >  				goto end;
> > > >  		}
> > > > -		if (device->power.states[state].flags.explicit_set) {
> > > > +		if (ps->flags.explicit_set) {
> > > >  			status = acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle,
> > > >  						      object_name, NULL, NULL);
> > > >  			if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > > > @@ -272,7 +275,15 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> > > >  			}
> > > >  		}
> > > >  	} else {
> > > > -		if (device->power.states[state].flags.explicit_set) {
> > > > +		/* If state is D3 Cold, try to evaluate _PS3 first */
> > > > +		if (state == ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) {
> > > > +			explicit_set = (ps - 1)->flags.explicit_set;
> > > > +			object_name[3] -= 1;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +		else {
> > > > +			explicit_set = ps->flags.explicit_set;
> > > > +		}
> > 
> > I really don't like this.  I think you should modify acpi_bus_get_power_flags(),
> > on top of the recent Lin Ming's patch, so that it sets flags.explicit_set for
> > D3_COLD if _PS3 is present and _PR3 is not.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> > I'm not sure you'll need the $subject patch any more then.
> > 
> 
> A little change is still required. I attached the code below.
> BTW, I think _PS3 will also need be executed if both _PS3 and _PR3
> available when putting a device into D3cold.

Yes, ACPI 5.0 seems to indicate so at least.

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> index 3263b68..187433f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -273,6 +273,9 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		if (device->power.states[state].flags.explicit_set) {
> +			/* evaluate _PS3 instead of _PS4 when entering D3Cold */
> +			if (state == ACPI_STATE_D3)
> +				object_name[3] -= 1;

Can you just put '3' here directly?  That'll be much cleaner than the
subtraction (that could have been -- as well).

>  			status = acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle,
>  						      object_name, NULL, NULL);
>  			if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 7417267..de2ae10 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -887,8 +887,12 @@ static int acpi_bus_get_power_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
>  		/* Evaluate "_PSx" to see if we can do explicit sets */
>  		object_name[2] = 'S';
>  		status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, object_name, &handle);
> -		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>  			ps->flags.explicit_set = 1;
> +			/* Also set D3Cold's explicit flag when _PS3 exists */
> +			if (i == ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT)
> +				(ps+1)->flags.explicit_set = 1;

Please don't use pointer arithmetics here.  I know it _happens_ to work,
but I don't think it's appropriate in this situation at all.

> +		}
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * State is valid if there are means to put the device into it.

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-23 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-31 18:18 [PATCH] ACPI: evaluate _PS3 when entering D3 Cold Aaron Lu
2012-04-01  5:27 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-01  5:56   ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-01  6:28     ` Lin Ming
2012-04-01  7:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-01  7:45         ` Zhang Rui
2012-04-01  8:49           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-05  3:20             ` huang ying
2012-04-08 23:41               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-09  2:24                 ` Huang Ying
2012-04-09 21:24                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-05  2:31         ` Lin Ming
2012-04-05  2:56           ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-05  3:01             ` Lin Ming
2012-04-08 23:54               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-09  1:38                 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-09 21:25                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-08 23:53             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-08 23:47           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-05  2:38         ` Lin Ming
2012-04-09  0:02           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-01 14:41       ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-01  7:03     ` Zhang Rui
2012-04-01  7:29       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-01 15:34       ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-01  7:47         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-01  8:01           ` Zhang Rui
2012-04-01  8:55             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-23  1:09 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-23 11:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-23 15:13     ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-23 19:50       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-04-24  2:07         ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-24  2:29           ` Lin Ming
2012-04-24  3:10             ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-24 13:15               ` Lin Ming
2012-04-24 14:24                 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-24 21:15                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-26  8:55                     ` huang ying
2012-04-26 20:04                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201204232150.57812.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=aaron.lu@amd.com \
    --cc=alex.he@amd.com \
    --cc=andiry.xu@amd.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox