From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Andiry Xu <andiry.xu@amd.com>, Alex He <alex.he@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: evaluate _PS3 when entering D3 Cold
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:50:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204232150.57812.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120423151327.GA4019@fedora>
On Monday, April 23, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:43:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, April 23, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael and Ming,
> > >
> > > Do you have any more comments on this patch?
> > > If not, can I have your ack? Thanks.
> > >
> > > -Aaron
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:18:30AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > > When entering D3 Cold from a higher device state, evaluate _PS3 first
> > > > and then make the proper power transition.
> > > > This is used to solve the ZPODD problem on AMD's platform, _PS3 on such
> > > > platforms will power off the ODD device and thus make the device enter
> > > > D3 cold state.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
> > > > Cc: Andiry Xu <andiry.xu@amd.com>
> > > > Cc: Alex He <alex.he@amd.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/acpi/bus.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > > > index 3263b68..68e593f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > > > @@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> > > > int result = 0;
> > > > acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> > > > char object_name[5] = { '_', 'P', 'S', '0' + state, '\0' };
> > > > + struct acpi_device_power_state *ps;
> > > > + u8 explicit_set;
> > > >
> > > > if (!device || (state < ACPI_STATE_D0) || (state > ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD))
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > @@ -239,7 +241,8 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - if (!device->power.states[state].flags.valid) {
> > > > + ps = &device->power.states[state];
> > > > + if (!ps->flags.valid) {
> > > > printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "Device does not support D%d\n", state);
> > > > return -ENODEV;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -263,7 +266,7 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> > > > if (result)
> > > > goto end;
> > > > }
> > > > - if (device->power.states[state].flags.explicit_set) {
> > > > + if (ps->flags.explicit_set) {
> > > > status = acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle,
> > > > object_name, NULL, NULL);
> > > > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > > > @@ -272,7 +275,15 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > } else {
> > > > - if (device->power.states[state].flags.explicit_set) {
> > > > + /* If state is D3 Cold, try to evaluate _PS3 first */
> > > > + if (state == ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) {
> > > > + explicit_set = (ps - 1)->flags.explicit_set;
> > > > + object_name[3] -= 1;
> > > > + }
> > > > + else {
> > > > + explicit_set = ps->flags.explicit_set;
> > > > + }
> >
> > I really don't like this. I think you should modify acpi_bus_get_power_flags(),
> > on top of the recent Lin Ming's patch, so that it sets flags.explicit_set for
> > D3_COLD if _PS3 is present and _PR3 is not.
> >
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> > I'm not sure you'll need the $subject patch any more then.
> >
>
> A little change is still required. I attached the code below.
> BTW, I think _PS3 will also need be executed if both _PS3 and _PR3
> available when putting a device into D3cold.
Yes, ACPI 5.0 seems to indicate so at least.
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> index 3263b68..187433f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -273,6 +273,9 @@ static int __acpi_bus_set_power(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> }
> } else {
> if (device->power.states[state].flags.explicit_set) {
> + /* evaluate _PS3 instead of _PS4 when entering D3Cold */
> + if (state == ACPI_STATE_D3)
> + object_name[3] -= 1;
Can you just put '3' here directly? That'll be much cleaner than the
subtraction (that could have been -- as well).
> status = acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle,
> object_name, NULL, NULL);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 7417267..de2ae10 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -887,8 +887,12 @@ static int acpi_bus_get_power_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
> /* Evaluate "_PSx" to see if we can do explicit sets */
> object_name[2] = 'S';
> status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, object_name, &handle);
> - if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> ps->flags.explicit_set = 1;
> + /* Also set D3Cold's explicit flag when _PS3 exists */
> + if (i == ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT)
> + (ps+1)->flags.explicit_set = 1;
Please don't use pointer arithmetics here. I know it _happens_ to work,
but I don't think it's appropriate in this situation at all.
> + }
>
> /*
> * State is valid if there are means to put the device into it.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-23 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-31 18:18 [PATCH] ACPI: evaluate _PS3 when entering D3 Cold Aaron Lu
2012-04-01 5:27 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-01 5:56 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-01 6:28 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-01 7:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-01 7:45 ` Zhang Rui
2012-04-01 8:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-05 3:20 ` huang ying
2012-04-08 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-09 2:24 ` Huang Ying
2012-04-09 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-05 2:31 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-05 2:56 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-05 3:01 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-08 23:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-09 1:38 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-09 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-08 23:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-08 23:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-05 2:38 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-09 0:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-01 14:41 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-01 7:03 ` Zhang Rui
2012-04-01 7:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-01 15:34 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-01 7:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-01 8:01 ` Zhang Rui
2012-04-01 8:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-23 1:09 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-23 11:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-23 15:13 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-23 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-04-24 2:07 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-24 2:29 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-24 3:10 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-24 13:15 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-24 14:24 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-24 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-26 8:55 ` huang ying
2012-04-26 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201204232150.57812.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=aaron.lu@amd.com \
--cc=alex.he@amd.com \
--cc=andiry.xu@amd.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox