linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Dâniel Fraga" <fragabr@gmail.com>,
	"ACPI Devel Mailing List" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Oleksij Rempel (fishor)" <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: ehci_hcd related S3 lockup on ASUS laptops, again)
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 22:01:06 +0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120601160106.GD4879@belkar.wrar.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338565844.13348.468.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1674 bytes --]

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:50:44AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > @@ -1743,6 +1743,11 @@ int pci_prepare_to_sleep(struct pci_dev
> > > >  	if (target_state == PCI_POWER_ERROR)
> > > >  		return -EIO;
> > > >  
> > > > +	/* Some devices mustn't be in D3 during system sleep */
> > > > +	if (target_state == PCI_D3hot &&
> > > > +			(dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3_DURING_SLEEP))
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > Why do you want to skip the wakeup setting in that case?
> > 
> > Because that's what the 151b61284776 commit did.  Also, the quirk marks 
> > the controller as not wakeup-capable.
> > 
> > Still, it's worth testing.  Andrey and Steve, here's an updated patch 
> > which should leave wakeup enabled on your EHCI controllers.  If you 
> > don't have a USB keyboard handy for generating a wakeup signal, you 
> > can test the wakeup functionality by doing:
> > 
> > 	echo enabled >/sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1/power/wakeup
> > 	echo enabled >/sys/bus/usb/devices/usb2/power/wakeup
> > 
> > before suspending.  (In fact you need only one of those two lines, but
> > at the moment I forget which -- probably the usb2 one.)  Then while
> > the system is asleep, either plugging or unplugging a USB device
> > directly into the computer should cause it to wake up.
> 
> I applied the patch, it suspends and resumes fine, but still no wakeup.
> 
> I even plugged in a USB keyboard, suspended, and tried to wake it up
> with that. That did not work. I even enabled what you stated above, with
> no effect (with keyboard or usb storage).
The same here, and the keyboard LEDs turn off on suspending.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-01 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1205252157430.24286-100000@saphir.localdomain>
     [not found] ` <1338005001.13348.279.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
     [not found]   ` <201205262227.47442.rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-05-26 21:16     ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: ehci_hcd related S3 lockup on ASUS laptops, again) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-26 21:19       ` [RFT][PATCH 1/4] ACPI / PM: Make acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() follow the specification Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-26 21:20       ` [RFT][PATCH 2/4] PCI / PM: Make platform choose target low-power states of more devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-26 21:21       ` [RFT][PATCH 3/4] ACPI / PM: Shorten variable name in acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-26 21:21       ` [RFT][PATCH 4/4] ACPI / PM: Fix interactions between _SxD and _SxW Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-26 21:47       ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: ehci_hcd related S3 lockup on ASUS laptops, again) Andrey Rahmatullin
2012-05-26 22:06         ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-26 22:36           ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: " Andrey Rahmatullin
2012-05-26 22:40             ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2012-05-26 22:59               ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-29 14:23                 ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2012-05-29 17:29                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-29 18:50                     ` Alan Stern
2012-05-29 19:16                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-31 21:07                         ` Alan Stern
2012-05-31 21:29                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-01 15:13                             ` Alan Stern
2012-06-01 15:50                               ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 15:59                                 ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: " Alan Stern
2012-06-01 17:01                                   ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 17:17                                     ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: " Alan Stern
2012-06-01 17:23                                       ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Steven Rostedt
2012-06-01 16:01                                 ` Andrey Rahmatullin [this message]
2012-06-01 16:33                                   ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: " Alan Stern
2012-05-31 22:02                           ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Dâniel Fraga
2012-06-01 14:55                             ` Alan Stern
2012-05-31 22:25                           ` Andrey Rahmatullin
2012-06-13  9:22                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-13 14:21                             ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: " Alan Stern
2012-05-27 16:41             ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2012-05-27 21:17               ` Andrey Rahmatullin
2012-05-28 20:13                 ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-29  7:48                   ` Andrey Rahmatullin
2012-05-29 17:30                     ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-29 22:39                   ` [RFT] PCI changes related to wakeup (was: " Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120601160106.GD4879@belkar.wrar.name \
    --to=wrar@wrar.name \
    --cc=bug-track@fisher-privat.net \
    --cc=fragabr@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).