From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp@alvarezp.com>
Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
680707@bugs.debian.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.4-rc5 -> 3.4-rc6 regression] Asus P5NSLI: lockup on resume from suspend
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 04:04:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120708090432.GF4625@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.wg30yabp6g6bxc@localhost.localdomain>
Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> The problem is a full system lock-up on resume.
[...]
> I bisected the problem as requested by Alan Stern, and tracked it
> down to the following commit:
>
> commit 2feec47d4c5f80b05f1650f5a24865718978eea4
[...]
> ACPICA: ACPI 5: Support for new FADT SleepStatus, SleepControl registers
Parsing that commit:
* new ACPICA-internal functions:
acpi_hw_execute_SST, acpi_hw_extended_sleep, acpi_hw_legacy_sleep,
acpi_hw_extended_wake_prep, acpi_hw_extended_wake,
acpi_hw_legacy_wake_prep, acpi_hw_legacy_wake.
* Various functions moved to hwxfsleep.c.
* acpi_enter_sleep_state_s4bios was moved to before
acpi_enter_sleep_state and acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep for no
apparent reason. Unchanged.
* acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep: factored out execution of _SST
(which sets System Status) into a helper. No functional change.
* acpi_enter_sleep_state: in the !(ACPI 5) case, just checks that
the sleep types are not out of bounds and calls
acpi_hw_legacy_sleep(). Functional change:
- disable bus master arbitration when entering sleep states other
than S5
No other functional change. _GTS ("Going To Sleep" hook) call
factored out into a helper.
* acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep: in the !(ACPI 5) case, just calls
acpi_hw_legacy_wake_prep(). _BFS ("Back From Sleep" method) call
factored out into a helper. No functional change.
* acpi_leave_sleep_state: in the !(ACPI 5) case, just calls
acpi_hw_legacy_wake(). _SST calls factored out. _WAK call
factored out. Functional change:
- enable bus master arbitaration
No other functional change.
So presumably it's the new writes to the ACPI_BITREG_ARB_DISABLE
register that cause trouble. The patch below tests that guess.
Now for a complaint. This would have been a lot easier if cleanups
that do not change behavior were split into separate commits --- one
commit per change. That makes it easy to verify that each patch
correctly does what it promises with no unintended side effects.
Though I understand that hacking ACPICA is hard, and there is probably
a lot to the story of its development I don't know.
Thanks,
Jonathan
diff --git i/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c w/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c
index 0ed85cac3231..615996a36bed 100644
--- i/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c
+++ w/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c
@@ -95,18 +95,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_hw_legacy_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u8 flags)
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
- if (sleep_state != ACPI_STATE_S5) {
- /*
- * Disable BM arbitration. This feature is contained within an
- * optional register (PM2 Control), so ignore a BAD_ADDRESS
- * exception.
- */
- status = acpi_write_bit_register(ACPI_BITREG_ARB_DISABLE, 1);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && (status != AE_BAD_ADDRESS)) {
- return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
- }
- }
-
/*
* 1) Disable/Clear all GPEs
* 2) Enable all wakeup GPEs
@@ -364,16 +352,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_hw_legacy_wake(u8 sleep_state, u8 flags)
[ACPI_EVENT_POWER_BUTTON].
status_register_id, ACPI_CLEAR_STATUS);
- /*
- * Enable BM arbitration. This feature is contained within an
- * optional register (PM2 Control), so ignore a BAD_ADDRESS
- * exception.
- */
- status = acpi_write_bit_register(ACPI_BITREG_ARB_DISABLE, 0);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && (status != AE_BAD_ADDRESS)) {
- return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
- }
-
acpi_hw_execute_sleep_method(METHOD_PATHNAME__SST, ACPI_SST_WORKING);
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-08 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <op.wg3en6ij6g6bxc@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1207072208270.508-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
[not found] ` <20120708025730.GE2961@burratino>
2012-07-08 4:19 ` [3.4-rc5 -> 3.4-rc6 regression] Asus P5NSLI: lockup on resume from suspend Octavio Alvarez
2012-07-08 4:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 6:39 ` Bug#680707: " Octavio Alvarez
2012-07-08 7:37 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 9:04 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2012-07-08 9:46 ` Bug#680707: " Octavio Alvarez
2012-07-08 19:04 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Leave Bus Master Arbitration enabled for suspend/resume Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 19:32 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 19:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-08 19:45 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-08 20:33 ` Moore, Robert
2012-07-08 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-08 20:43 ` Octavio Alvarez
2012-07-08 20:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120708090432.GF4625@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=680707@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=alvarezp@alvarezp.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).