From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7 v2] fix memory leak when memory device is unbound from the module acpi_memhotplug Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:55:19 -0700 Message-ID: <20120711145519.e94cd183.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <4FFD2F1E.10006@cn.fujitsu.com> <4FFD2F76.9000508@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FFD2F76.9000508@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wen Congyang Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Yasuaki ISIMATU , David Rientjes , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "Brown, Len" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:47:02 +0800 Wen Congyang wrote: > To: lenb@kernel.org I'm still not sure if that email address works? I've been cc'ing len.brown@intel.com lately as well. There are some pretty serious-looking bugfixes in this series. I merged your patches into my tree to get them a bit of testing. Please note that I renamed them all so their titles reflect the subsystem which they are patching. Documentation/SubmittingPatches section 15 goes into details on this convention. Having done that rename, it becomes obvious that patches 1-6 are acpi memhotplug changes, but the seventh patch is a fix against core MM code. I've sent that patch to Linus earlier today.