From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix not loading acpi-cpufreq driver regression
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:55:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207122255.56952.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201207121103.07832.trenn@suse.de>
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Commit d640113fe80e45ebd4a5b420b introduced a regression on SMP
> systems where the processor core with ACPI id zero is disabled
> (typically should be the case because of hyperthreading).
> The regression got spread through stable kernels.
> On 3.0.X it got introduced via 3.0.18.
>
> Such platforms may be rare, but do exist.
> Look out for a disabled processor with acpi_id 0 in dmesg:
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x10] disabled)
>
> This problem has been observed on a:
> HP Proliant BL280c G6 blade
>
> This patch restricts the introduced workaround to platforms
> with nr_cpu_ids <= 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Applied to the pm-cpufreq branch of the linux-pm.git tree.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> index c850de4..eff7222 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> @@ -189,10 +189,12 @@ int acpi_get_cpuid(acpi_handle handle, int type, u32 acpi_id)
> * Processor (CPU3, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
> * }
> *
> - * Ignores apic_id and always return 0 for CPU0's handle.
> + * Ignores apic_id and always returns 0 for the processor
> + * handle with acpi id 0 if nr_cpu_ids is 1.
> + * This should be the case if SMP tables are not found.
> * Return -1 for other CPU's handle.
> */
> - if (acpi_id == 0)
> + if (nr_cpu_ids <= 1 && acpi_id == 0)
> return acpi_id;
> else
> return apic_id;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-11 17:43 [GIT PULL] Power management fix for 3.5-rc7 Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-12 8:57 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-07-12 9:00 ` [PATCH] ACPICA: Fix possible fault in return package object repair code Thomas Renninger
2012-07-12 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-12 9:03 ` [PATCH] Fix not loading acpi-cpufreq driver regression Thomas Renninger
2012-07-12 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-07-12 9:48 ` [GIT PULL] Power management fix for 3.5-rc7 Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-25 11:00 [PATCH] Fix not loading acpi-cpufreq driver regression Thomas Renninger
2012-06-25 11:20 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-25 14:05 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-06-25 14:39 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-25 14:45 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207122255.56952.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox