From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] ACPI: add module_acpi_driver() and convert drivers
 to it
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:15:37 +0300
Message-ID: <20120713081537.GN25330@intel.com>
References: <1340881171-14811-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:57671 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751441Ab2GMINj (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 04:13:39 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1340881171-14811-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
To: lenb@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, khali@linux-fr.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net, mjg@redhat.com, ike.pan@canonical.com, herton@canonical.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 01:59:19PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> This is similar than what is done for other busses before (PCI, I2C, SPI,
> platform). It reduces a lot of unnecessary boilerplate code from modules.
> 
> We also remove following redundant check on few drivers:
> 
> 	if (acpi_disabled)
> 		return -ENODEV;
> 
> as this same check is already done at the beginning of
> acpi_bus_register_driver().
> 
> I think these should all go via ACPI tree because they all depend on the
> first patch which adds the macro to the ACPI subsystem.

Len, do you have any comments? Could you consider merging these patches?

Thanks.