From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Woithe Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] platform: x86: remove acpi_bus_generate_proc_event Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:53:36 +0930 Message-ID: <20120903002336.GD25170@marvin.atrad.com.au> References: <1346630611.3170.32.camel@offbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from server.atrad.com.au ([150.101.241.2]:59454 "EHLO server.atrad.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755134Ab2ICAal (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:30:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1346630611.3170.32.camel@offbook> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjg@redhat.com On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:03:31AM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > Calling this function no longer makes sense as /proc/acpi/event > is being removed. > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso > : > drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 4 ---- > : > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c > index c4c1a54..2fac1c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c > @@ -773,8 +773,6 @@ static void acpi_fujitsu_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event) > else > set_lcd_level(newb); > } > - acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(fujitsu->dev, > - ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_INC_BRIGHTNESS, 0); > keycode = KEY_BRIGHTNESSUP; > } else if (oldb > newb) { > if (disable_brightness_adjust != 1) { > @@ -783,8 +781,6 @@ static void acpi_fujitsu_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event) > else > set_lcd_level(newb); > } > - acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(fujitsu->dev, > - ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_DEC_BRIGHTNESS, 0); > keycode = KEY_BRIGHTNESSDOWN; > } > break; Presumedly the intention here is for these events to be delivered via the input layer after the removal of /proc/acpi/event (as is done later in the above function). If that's the case, then: Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe Regards jonathan