linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, pdeschrijver@nvidia.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] acpi : move the acpi_idle_driver variable declaration
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:19:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209072319.33742.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347013172-12465-2-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

On Friday, September 07, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This variable is only used in the in processor_driver.c.
> This patch reduces the scope of the variable by moving it
> to this file.

Well, the changelog is wrong (because the scope of the variable is
not reduced by moving it out of the header) and I don't see the point.

Is there any _real_ problem with that definition in processor.h?

Rafael


> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |    2 +-
>  include/acpi/processor.h        |    1 -
>  2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> index bfc31cb..e1f6330 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_processor_driver = {
>  
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor *, processors);
>  EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(processors);
> -
> +extern struct cpuidle_driver acpi_idle_driver;
>  struct acpi_processor_errata errata __read_mostly;
>  
>  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
> index db427fa..8b2c39a 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
> @@ -332,7 +332,6 @@ int acpi_processor_power_exit(struct acpi_processor *pr,
>  			      struct acpi_device *device);
>  int acpi_processor_suspend(struct device *dev);
>  int acpi_processor_resume(struct device *dev);
> -extern struct cpuidle_driver acpi_idle_driver;
>  
>  /* in processor_thermal.c */
>  int acpi_processor_get_limit_info(struct acpi_processor *pr);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-07 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-07 10:19 [PATCH 0/6] cpuidle : per cpu latencies Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] acpi : move the acpi_idle_driver variable declaration Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-07 21:19   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-09-11 11:14     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-11 20:28       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] acpi : move cpuidle_device field out of the acpi_processor_power structure Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-07 11:03   ` Amit Kucheria
2012-09-07 21:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-07 21:54     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-07 22:06       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-11 12:20         ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-11 20:32           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 3/6] acpi : remove pointless cpuidle device state_count init Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-07 11:01   ` Amit Kucheria
2012-09-07 21:50   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-16 20:38     ` Daniel Lezcano
     [not found]       ` <505638D9.80302-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-16 21:02         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 4/6] cpuidle : add a pointer for cpuidle_state in the cpuidle_device Daniel Lezcano
     [not found] ` <1347013172-12465-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-07 10:19   ` [PATCH 5/6] cpuidle : use per cpuidle device cpu states Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-07 10:19 ` [PATCH 6/6] cpuidle : add cpuidle_register_states function Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-07 11:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpuidle : per cpu latencies Amit Kucheria
2012-09-07 12:02   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-07 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-17  8:03   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-17 20:50     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-17 21:35       ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-09-18  9:52         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2012-09-18 21:10           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-18 11:19         ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-09-18 21:05         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201209072319.33742.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).