From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:54:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20121121225450.026dcaf6@endymion.delvare> References: <1353407384-26880-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1353435212-15325-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <79636467.nuLQX2FqW5@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <79636467.nuLQX2FqW5@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@linaro.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de, Mika Westerberg , rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, ben-linux@fluff.org, bhelgaas@google.com, mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:31:15 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Mathias Nyman (1): > > gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support > > > > Mika Westerberg (2): > > spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support > > i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support > > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few > iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point. > > I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or > would like the patches to be modified somehow? I'd say go ahead, any issue that shows up can be fixed afterward. > If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because > the patches depend on some changes already in that tree. Hopefully, that's OK. Yes. -- Jean Delvare