linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@hp.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, lance_ortiz@hotmail.com,
	jiang.liu@huawei.com, tony.luck@intel.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mchehab@redhat.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] aerdrv: Enhanced AER logging
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 17:01:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121201160144.GC12274@liondog.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121201155130.GA12274@liondog.tnic>

On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 04:51:30PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > @@ -281,9 +286,17 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
> >  	"%s""bridge: secondary_status: 0x%04x, control: 0x%04x\n",
> >  	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
> > -	if (pcie->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_AER_INFO) {
> > +	dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(pcie->device_id.segment,
> > +			pcie->device_id.bus, pcie->device_id.function);
> > +	if (!dev)
> > +		pr_info("PCI AER Cannot get PCI device %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> > +			pcie->device_id.segment, pcie->device_id.bus,
> > +			pcie->device_id.slot, pcie->device_id.function);
> > +
> > +	if (pcie->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_AER_INFO && dev) {
> 
> You don't need to test dev here because you've tested for !dev in the
> line above...
> 
> >  		struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs = (void *)pcie->aer_info;
> > -		cper_print_aer(pfx, gdata->error_severity, aer_regs);
> > +		cper_print_aer(dev, gdata->error_severity, aer_regs);
> > +		pci_dev_put(dev);
> 
> ... and thus this pci_dev_put() has to be unconditional, i.e. after the
> if test.

Not entirely correct: you don't need to test dev if you return early in
the !dev case. And AFAICT you should return early because if you can't
get dev, you can't call cper_print_aer() afterwards.

IOW, this hunk should look like this:

@@ -281,10 +286,19 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
        "%s""bridge: secondary_status: 0x%04x, control: 0x%04x\n",
        pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
-       if (pcie->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_AER_INFO) {
-               struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs = (void *)pcie->aer_info;
-               cper_print_aer(pfx, gdata->error_severity, aer_regs);
+       dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(pcie->device_id.segment,
+                       pcie->device_id.bus, pcie->device_id.function);
+       if (!dev) {
+               pr_info("PCI AER Cannot get PCI device %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
+                       pcie->device_id.segment, pcie->device_id.bus,
+                       pcie->device_id.slot, pcie->device_id.function);
+               return;
        }
+
+       if (pcie->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_AER_INFO)
+               cper_print_aer(dev, gdata->error_severity,
+                              (struct aer_capability_regs *)pcie->aer_info);
+       pci_dev_put(dev);
 #endif
 }

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-01 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-30 21:33 [PATCH v3 1/3] aerdrv: Trace Event for AER Lance Ortiz
2012-11-30 21:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] aerdrv: Enhanced AER logging Lance Ortiz
2012-12-01 15:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-01 16:01     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-11-30 21:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] aerdrv: Cleanup log output for CPER based AER Lance Ortiz
2012-12-01 15:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-01 10:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] aerdrv: Trace Event for AER Borislav Petkov
2012-12-01 11:36 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-12-01 11:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-01 13:28     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-12-03 20:01   ` Ortiz, Lance E
2012-12-03 20:27     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-03 21:13       ` Ortiz, Lance E
2012-12-03 21:17         ` Borislav Petkov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-30 20:39 [PATCH v3 2/3] aerdrv: Enhanced AER logging Lance Ortiz
2012-11-30 20:59 ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121201160144.GC12274@liondog.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=lance.ortiz@hp.com \
    --cc=lance_ortiz@hotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).