From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: Look Ma, da kernel is b0rken Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:44:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20121205164410.GD28556@liondog.tnic> References: <20121205070901.GA12123@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> <20121205142935.GA12119@liondog.tnic> <20121205152756.5afec12c@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20121205163905.GA18522@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:49496 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752538Ab2LEQp2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:45:28 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121205163905.GA18522@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Mohr Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:39:05PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Thanks to Borislav Petkov for his reply, too - > however I'd like to state that given this lack of tooling/attention > writing a mail in this more special manner was fully justified IMPHO. Ok, you've stated more than clearly that you're pissed with the current situation - I think we all got that. Now, how do you suggest we change it constructively and how are you willing to help? Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.