From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: Look Ma, da kernel is b0rken Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:37:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20121205173718.GF28556@liondog.tnic> References: <20121205070901.GA12123@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> <20121205142935.GA12119@liondog.tnic> <20121205152756.5afec12c@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20121205153121.GA28556@liondog.tnic> <20121205154749.2af4ef36@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20121205155900.GB28556@liondog.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:46596 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751599Ab2LERhU (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 12:37:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , Andreas Mohr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Shaohua , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 06:04:38PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I think Geert is doing something like that but I'm not sure he's > > even using W=. > > I'm using whatever build output is generated by the linux-next build > service. Then most probably not. W= levels are supplied at the make command line and I don't think they're doing that due to the sheer amount of warnings being spewed with W=. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.