From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:44:05 -0800 Message-ID: <20121217184405.GB4945@kroah.com> References: <1558789.gX8cmBgyDV@vostro.rjw.lan> <4085861.TBmZVTPOvU@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:53585 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753229Ab2LQSoK (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:44:10 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f46.google.com with SMTP id p5so2976259dak.19 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:44:10 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4085861.TBmZVTPOvU@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML , Bjorn Helgaas , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , tony.luck@intel.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , Yinghai Lu , Jiang Liu , Martin Schwidefsky , Jan Glauber On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to > acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate > "firmware_node" and "physical_node0" files for them, but currently > the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward > (to put it lightly). That's just crazy, thanks for unwinding this mess, nice job. Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman