From: Leonid Isaev <lisaev@umail.iu.edu>
To: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"André Przywara" <andre@andrep.de>,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg@redhat.com>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [arch-general] powernow-k8 fails to load with linux 3.7.2
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:27:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130117192721.084408ad@bluemoon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG-2HqVm+=pcd5hNtPqtbQYseDRZhi=hFaji6+xs8+26V2HW+A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3106 bytes --]
Sorry for a late reply...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:34:22 +0100
Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:16:00PM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> >> > [ fixup Andre's address. ]
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:33:21PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > > > down the frequancy, but is accompanied by an info-level kernel
> >> > > > message "acpi-cpufreq: overriding BIOS provided _PSD data".
> >> >
> >> > That just says that BIOS has crappy data and we're using our own.
> >>
> >> OK. Yes, my BIOS is broken, so I thought it was the reason why
> >> autoloading does not work.
> >
> > Hmm, come to think of it, we're issuing this message on SMP on *all*
> > AMDs with HW_PSTATE. Andre, remind me again why we're doing this? We're
> > basically saying that we're overriding ACPI data but we still read it
> > out from acpi_perf_data and use *that* data to prepare the frequencies
> > table. What am I missing?
> >
> >> To be more precise: "modprobe powernow-k8" returns a "no such device"
> >> error,
> >
> > That's correct - we say ENODEV on your CPU which supports hardware
> > P-states and hand off to acpi-cpufreq which has that functionality now.
> >
> >> but in kernel logs I see that acpi-cpufreq is indeed loaded:
> >> -------
> >> Jan 15 22:42:19 metal-0 kernel: [ 534.003995] acpi-cpufreq: overriding
> >> BIOS provided _PSD data
> >> Jan 15 22:42:32 metal-0 kernel: [ 547.122695] powernow-k8: this CPU is
> >> not supported anymore, using acpi-cpufreq instead.
> >> Jan 15 22:42:45 metal-0 kernel: [ 559.623068] powernow-k8: this CPU is
> >> not supported anymore, using acpi-cpufreq instead.
> >> -------
> >> (the CPU in question is phenom II x4 955). However, this is only after I
> >> attempt to _manually_ load powernow-k8 (the timestamps in [...] are ~6
> >> mins after boot is completed). So the above-mentioned handoff seems to
> >> work, but please find attached my kernel config.
> >
> > Ok, this is maybe the issue. What used to load powernow-k8 on your
> > distro before? Because basically it's enough if some script did
> > 'modprobe powernow-k8' for the handoff to just work.
> >
> > But, we also have the CPU autoprobing deal:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=644e9cbbe3fc032cc92d0936057e166a994dc246
>
> Arch relies entirely on the CPU autoprobing, there are no scripts
> modprobing things at boot.
That's right, processor drivers used to be automatically loaded alongside
with kvm and kvm_amd. Now, only the KVM stuff is loaded.
>
> > so, *actually*, powernow-k8 should be loaded by default. I dunno, maybe
> > upgrade udev on your distro?
>
> Assuming Leonid's system is up-to-date, Arch ships the most recent
> udev version (197).
Yes, the system is fully updated running systemd/udev 197.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom
Thank you,
L.
--
Leonid Isaev
GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D
Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-18 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130115224755.085aa6b7@bluemoon>
[not found] ` <CAG-2HqWPOYKVCj-Z=z_1e=mE6b6z9hMYFJzHf2GYAmTwQovN0A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20130116131725.4e590c34@bluemoon>
2013-01-16 20:37 ` [arch-general] powernow-k8 fails to load with linux 3.7.2 Tom Gundersen
2013-01-16 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-16 23:17 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20130116181600.4c48ee3b@bluemoon>
2013-01-17 9:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-17 10:34 ` Tom Gundersen
2013-01-18 1:27 ` Leonid Isaev [this message]
2013-01-18 1:40 ` Leonid Isaev
2013-01-18 11:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 12:32 ` André Przywara
2013-01-18 15:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-18 15:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 15:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-18 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 17:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-19 12:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 5:14 ` Leonid Isaev
2013-01-21 10:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 17:13 ` Leonid Isaev
2013-01-18 16:59 ` Leonid Isaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130117192721.084408ad@bluemoon \
--to=lisaev@umail.iu.edu \
--cc=andre@andrep.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=teg@jklm.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox