From: Leonid Isaev <lisaev@umail.iu.edu>
To: "André Przywara" <andre@andrep.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [arch-general] powernow-k8 fails to load with linux 3.7.2
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:13:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130118111342.3d17fef1@bluemoon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130118133233.4521ddb6@hydra>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2624 bytes --]
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:32:33 +0100
André Przywara <andre@andrep.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:37:17 +0100
> Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> (updating Matthew's email as per MAINTAINERS)
>
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 07:40:44PM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > > Arrh, modprobe still does not exit cleanly with this...
> >
> > As I said already above:
> >
> > >> That's correct - we say ENODEV on your CPU which supports hardware
> > >> P-states and hand off to acpi-cpufreq which has that functionality
> > >> now.
> >
> > It is supposed to work that way: we return an error from the
> > powernow-k8 init function so that it doesn't load but hand off to
> > acpi-cpufreq so that it gets loaded instead.
> >
> > > > But, we also have the CPU autoprobing deal:
> > > >
> > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=644e9cbbe3fc032cc92d0936057e166a994dc246
> > > >
> > > > so, *actually*, powernow-k8 should be loaded by default. I dunno,
> > > > maybe upgrade udev on your distro?
> > >
> > > Udev 196 and 197 + linux <= 3.6.11 yield correct CPU autoprobing.
> > > However, udev 197 + linux 3.7.2 do not. I haven't tested udev 196
> > > with 3.7.2 though, but it does not look like a udev issue.
> >
> > Hmm, I'll bet this has something to do with the fact that HW_PSTATE is
> > in another CPUID function on AMD than on Intel and udev doesn't see
> > that bit to load acpi-cpufreq automatically.
>
> But the acpi-cpufreq does not export it's dependency on some CPUID
> flags, since it is an _ACPI_ module. Shouldn't the load be triggered
> while parsing the ACPI tree instead?
>
> $ /sbin/modinfo drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko | grep alias
> alias: acpi
>
> $ /sbin/modinfo drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.ko | grep alias
> alias: x86cpu:vendor:0002:family:000F:model:*:feature:*
>
> How does ArchLinux loads acpi-cpufreq on Intel CPUs? It should now be
> the same mechanism on AMD. Or does it have acpi-cpufreq somehow
> hard-coded in the scripts for GenuineIntel?
In both cases Intel and AMD we rely on the kernel/udev autoprobing to insert
correct CPU and KVM drivers, i.e. there are no custom scripts or manual loading
of modules via systemd. However, in Intel's case acpi_cpufreq is loaded
correctly (and always has been). Indeed, on an Intel core2duo:
$ dmesg | grep -i cpufreq
[ 9.005851] ACPI: Requesting acpi_cpufreq
>
> Regards,
> Andre.
Sincerely,
L.
--
Leonid Isaev
GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D
Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-18 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130115224755.085aa6b7@bluemoon>
[not found] ` <CAG-2HqWPOYKVCj-Z=z_1e=mE6b6z9hMYFJzHf2GYAmTwQovN0A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20130116131725.4e590c34@bluemoon>
2013-01-16 20:37 ` [arch-general] powernow-k8 fails to load with linux 3.7.2 Tom Gundersen
2013-01-16 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-16 23:17 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20130116181600.4c48ee3b@bluemoon>
2013-01-17 9:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-17 10:34 ` Tom Gundersen
2013-01-18 1:27 ` Leonid Isaev
2013-01-18 1:40 ` Leonid Isaev
2013-01-18 11:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 12:32 ` André Przywara
2013-01-18 15:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-18 15:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 15:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-18 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 17:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-19 12:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 5:14 ` Leonid Isaev
2013-01-21 10:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 17:13 ` Leonid Isaev [this message]
2013-01-18 16:59 ` Leonid Isaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130118111342.3d17fef1@bluemoon \
--to=lisaev@umail.iu.edu \
--cc=andre@andrep.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=teg@jklm.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox