From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] acpi-cpufreq and powernow-k8 fixes Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 01:04:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20130121000402.GA19343@pd.tnic> References: <1358677470-17394-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <1838903.lYvY4Nk4I1@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1838903.lYvY4Nk4I1@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Przywara , Leonid Isaev , Tom Gundersen , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Borislav Petkov List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:18:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, it all looks reasonable to me. > > I suppose you'd like it to go into v3.8 plus v3.7-stable, right? Well, sort of. Patch 0001 which you've already taken and tagged for 3.7-stable and is on its way to 3.8 is fine since it fixes a bug. The rest are, IMHO, more or less annoyances fixes which could easily wait for 3.9 and maybe be backported if there really is an issue. Also, they'd see a lot more testing this way. Because in at least 99% of the cases, acpi-cpufreq and powernow-k8 are modules and the handoff works there. This is at least how I see it, you tell me whether it makes sense or not. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --