From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/8] ACPI, PCI: avoid building pci_slot as module Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 04:36:17 +0000 Message-ID: <20130129043617.GA14395@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1358525267-14268-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <1358525267-14268-5-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <3500982.MUDp6kKU3R@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Yinghai Lu , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jiang Liu , Jiang Liu , Kenji Kaneshige , Yijing Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , ACPI Devel Maling List , Toshi Kani , Myron Stowe List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:14:11PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT=y in RHEL6, so evidently they have this problem. I'm not aware of anyone ever filing any bugs against it, either, though Myron would have a better idea. What's the worst case outcome of someone ending up with an incorrect slot number? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org