linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH EDAC 03/13] ghes: add the needed hooks for EDAC error report
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:50:21 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130222055021.12125c03@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361493911.7093.37.camel@yhuang-dev>

Em Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:45:11 +0800
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> escreveu:

> On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 09:04 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:26:07 +0800
> > Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> escreveu:
> > 

> > There is also an advantage on taking this approach: this patch can have just
> > the ghes changes, and will still compile fine, as CONFIG_EDAC_GHES is not
> > defined yet. So, the patch becomes is simpler and easier to review.
> 
> Thanks for your explanation.  I agree to keep this in header file.
> 
> My original suggestion is that it may be better to move this from ghes.h
> to some place like "ghes_edac.h", because these functions are
> implemented in "ghes_edac.c" instead of ghes.c.
> 

Ah! Well, I considered a separate header when writing this patch, but adding 
another header for just 3 functions where the parameters are more related to
ghes than with ghes_edac seemed overkill to me.

IMO, a single comment at the header pointing to ghes_edac.c would improve it.

> >  	switch (generic->notify.type) {
> >  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_POLLED:
> >  		ghes->timer.function = ghes_poll_func;
> > @@ -911,13 +920,13 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
> >  		if (acpi_gsi_to_irq(generic->notify.vector, &ghes->irq)) {
> >  			pr_err(GHES_PFX "Failed to map GSI to IRQ for generic hardware error source: %d\n",
> >  			       generic->header.source_id);
> > -			goto err;
> > +			goto err2;
> >  		}
> >  		if (request_irq(ghes->irq, ghes_irq_func,
> >  				0, "GHES IRQ", ghes)) {
> >  			pr_err(GHES_PFX "Failed to register IRQ for generic hardware error source: %d\n",
> >  			       generic->header.source_id);
> > -			goto err;
> > +			goto err2;
> >  		}
> >  		break;
> >  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI:
> > @@ -943,6 +952,8 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(ghes_dev, ghes);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > +err2:
> 
> Suggest to rename it to err_edac_unreg or something like that.  Just a
> suggestion.

Done.

I'm folding the enclosed patch on it.

Thanks for review!

Regards,
Mauro

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 19092dc..d668a8a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -920,13 +920,13 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
 		if (acpi_gsi_to_irq(generic->notify.vector, &ghes->irq)) {
 			pr_err(GHES_PFX "Failed to map GSI to IRQ for generic hardware error source: %d\n",
 			       generic->header.source_id);
-			goto err2;
+			goto err_edac_unreg;
 		}
 		if (request_irq(ghes->irq, ghes_irq_func,
 				0, "GHES IRQ", ghes)) {
 			pr_err(GHES_PFX "Failed to register IRQ for generic hardware error source: %d\n",
 			       generic->header.source_id);
-			goto err2;
+			goto err_edac_unreg;
 		}
 		break;
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI:
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
 	platform_set_drvdata(ghes_dev, ghes);
 
 	return 0;
-err2:
+err_edac_unreg:
 	ghes_edac_unregister(ghes);
 err:
 	if (ghes) {
diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
index 9015ec2..d11d952 100644
--- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
+++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ enum {
 	GHES_SEV_PANIC = 0x3,
 };
 
+/* From drivers/edac/ghes_acpi.h */
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_GHES
 void ghes_edac_report_mem_error(struct ghes *ghes, int sev,
 				struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err);



-- 

Cheers,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-22  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-15 12:44 [PATCH EDAC 00/13] Add a driver to report Firmware first errors (via GHES) Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 01/13] edac: lock module owner to avoid error report conflicts Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 02/13] ghes: move structures/enum to a header file Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 03/13] ghes: add the needed hooks for EDAC error report Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-21  1:26   ` Huang Ying
2013-02-21 12:04     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-22  0:45       ` Huang Ying
2013-02-22  8:50         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2013-02-22  8:57           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-25  0:25             ` Huang Ying
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 04/13] edac: add a new memory layer type Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 05/13] ghes_edac: Register at EDAC core the BIOS report Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 06/13] ghes_edac: Allow registering more than once Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 07/13] edac: add support for raw error reports Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 14:13   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-15 15:25     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 15:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-15 15:49         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 16:02           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-15 18:20             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-16 16:57               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-17 10:44                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-18 13:52                   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-18 15:24                     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-19 11:56                       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 08/13] ghes_edac: add support for reporting errors via EDAC Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 09/13] ghes_edac: do a better job of filling EDAC DIMM info Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 10/13] edac: better report error conditions in debug mode Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 11/13] edac: initialize the core earlier Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:45 ` [PATCH EDAC 12/13] ghes_edac.c: Don't credit the same memory dimm twice Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:45 ` [PATCH EDAC 13/13] ghes_edac: Improve driver's printk messages Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 16:38   ` Joe Perches
2013-02-15 17:33     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130222055021.12125c03@redhat.com \
    --to=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).