From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib-acpi: introduce acpi_get_gpio_by_index() helper Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:57:11 +0300 Message-ID: <20130412065710.GM1283@intel.com> References: <1364986614-15711-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <15166969.9Sfs2U7qQb@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130411072912.GE1283@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:14747 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752693Ab3DLGxA (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:53:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Grant Likely , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mathias Nyman , ACPI Devel Maling List On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:35:05AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Mika Westerberg > wrote: > > > Grant and Linus W, > > > > Do you have any comments on this patch? Could it still be merged for 3.10? > > No and yes. > > Applied and pushed for linux-next now. Thanks! > Sorry for taking so long, I was confused by the discussion. np. We probably need to add another ACPI GPIO helper function to get all the GPIOs but I guess we can do that once a need emerges. For a single GPIO (like the patch here does) we know already from internal discussion that it will be needed. > I had to use some fuzzing to apply the patch, please check the > result in linux-next. Looks good to me.