From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ACPI: Add early console framework for DBGP/DBG2. Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:23:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20130604132322.GA10933@srcf.ucam.org> References: <09ee0e9c79c57da2fc9d0af1c2daeaacdc0bb234.1349838218.git.lv.zheng@intel.com> <20121010174406.GA13861@srcf.ucam.org> <1350069843.7065.65.camel@rhapsody> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:56318 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751418Ab3FDNXw (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:23:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Khalid Aziz , Matthew Garrett , Lv Zheng , Len Brown , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jason Wessel , Feng Tang , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Mailing List , x86@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Al Stone On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:53:56AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > Matthew, can you point me at the license Microsoft is using for the > DBG2 table? I can download the document from Microsoft's site without > seeing any reference to it being licensed only for BIOS implementers. > All I see is a "this document is provided 'as-is', blah blah blah" > blurb at the beginning of the document. It may be that Microsoft has > changed the license on this document in the last 6 months. The DBGP spec still seems to have the restrictive license, but I can't find it on DBG2. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org