From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Dirk Griesbach <spamthis@freenet.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-acpi: add back ACPI based hotplug functionality
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:41:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130624224131.GM1918@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1715067.uK3nZ8ehWr@vostro.rjw.lan>
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 02:43:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
>
> Commit 30dcf76acc69 "libata: migrate ACPI code over to new bindings"
> mistakenly dropped the code to register hotplug notificaion handler
> for ATA port/devices, causing regression for people using ATA bay,
> as kernel bug #59871 shows.
>
> Fix this by adding back the hotplug notification handler registration
> code. Since this code has to be run once and notification needs to
> be installed on every ATA port/devices handle no matter if there is
> actual device attached, we can't do this in binding time for ATA
> device ACPI handle, as the binding only occurs when a SCSI device is
> created, i.e. there is device attached. So introduce the
> ata_acpi_hotplug_init() function to loop scan all ATA ACPI handles
> and if it is available, install the notificaion handler for it during
> ATA init time.
>
> With the ATA ACPI handle binding to SCSI device tree, it is possible
> now that when the SCSI hotplug work removes the SCSI device, the ACPI
> unbind function will find that the corresponding ACPI device has
> already been deleted by dock driver, causing a scaring message like:
> [ 128.263966] scsi 4:0:0:0: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
> Fix this by waiting for SCSI hotplug task finish in our notificaion
> handler, so that the removal of ACPI device done in ACPI unbind
> function triggered by the removal of SCSI device is run earlier when
> ACPI device is still available.
>
> [rjw: Rebased]
> References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59871
> Reported-bisected-and-tested-by: Dirk Griesbach <spamthis@freenet.de>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> May I add the $subject patch to that series and push along with it?
Yes, please.
Thanks a lot!
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-24 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-24 12:43 [PATCH] libata-acpi: add back ACPI based hotplug functionality Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-24 22:41 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-06-26 1:43 ` Aaron Lu
2013-06-26 12:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130624224131.GM1918@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=spamthis@freenet.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).