From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerry Snitselaar Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi_i2c: set MODULE_LICENSE, MODULE_AUTHOR, and MODULE_DESCRIPTION Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:34:03 -0700 Message-ID: <20130820033403.GD4587@cantor.us.oracle.com> References: <1376702795-25912-1-git-send-email-jerry.snitselaar@oracle.com> <2870377.GVGv4QBgQK@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130819233528.GA4587@cantor.us.oracle.com> <1838503.PYpZe7GJ51@vostro.rjw.lan> Reply-To: Jerry Snitselaar Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:43892 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751757Ab3HTDeP (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:34:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1838503.PYpZe7GJ51@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Mika Westerberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue Aug 20 13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, August 19, 2013 04:35:29 PM Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > > On Tue Aug 20 13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, August 19, 2013 09:16:14 AM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:26:35PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > > > > > Without MODULE_LICENSE set, I get the following with modprobe: > > > > > > > > > > acpi_i2c: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel. > > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol i2c_new_device (err 0) > > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_get_resources (err 0) > > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_resource_interrupt (err 0) > > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_free_resource_list (err 0) > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mika Westerbeg > > > > > > Well, OK, but do we need to be able to build that as a module? > > > > > > Maybe it should just be yes or no? > > > > > > Rafael > > > > > > > Perhaps have depends on I2C=y and be a bool instead of tristate? > > Yes, that's the idea. > Does this look okay Mika? [PATCH] acpi_i2c: do not build as loadable module Change from tristate to bool, and depend on I2C=y Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar --- drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig index 100bd72..183a309 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig @@ -181,8 +181,9 @@ config ACPI_DOCK drive bays such as the IBM Ultrabay and the Dell Module Bay. config ACPI_I2C - def_tristate I2C - depends on I2C + bool "I2C" + depends on I2C=y + default n help ACPI I2C enumeration support. -- 1.8.4.rc3.2.g2c2b664