From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi_i2c: set MODULE_LICENSE, MODULE_AUTHOR, and MODULE_DESCRIPTION Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:28:20 +0300 Message-ID: <20130820072820.GT4898@intel.com> References: <1376702795-25912-1-git-send-email-jerry.snitselaar@oracle.com> <2870377.GVGv4QBgQK@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130819233528.GA4587@cantor.us.oracle.com> <1838503.PYpZe7GJ51@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130820033403.GD4587@cantor.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130820033403.GD4587@cantor.us.oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jerry Snitselaar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:34:03PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > On Tue Aug 20 13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, August 19, 2013 04:35:29 PM Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > > > On Tue Aug 20 13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Monday, August 19, 2013 09:16:14 AM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:26:35PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > > > > > > Without MODULE_LICENSE set, I get the following with modprobe: > > > > > > > > > > > > acpi_i2c: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel. > > > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol i2c_new_device (err 0) > > > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_get_resources (err 0) > > > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_resource_interrupt (err 0) > > > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_free_resource_list (err 0) > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar > > > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mika Westerbeg > > > > > > > > Well, OK, but do we need to be able to build that as a module? > > > > > > > > Maybe it should just be yes or no? > > > > > > > > Rafael > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps have depends on I2C=y and be a bool instead of tristate? > > > > Yes, that's the idea. > > > Does this look okay Mika? > > [PATCH] acpi_i2c: do not build as loadable module > > Change from tristate to bool, and depend on I2C=y I'm not sure about this. Does the below mean that we can't build the ACPI I2C enumeration at all if I2C core is compiled as module? > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar > --- > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > index 100bd72..183a309 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > @@ -181,8 +181,9 @@ config ACPI_DOCK > drive bays such as the IBM Ultrabay and the Dell Module Bay. > > config ACPI_I2C > - def_tristate I2C > - depends on I2C > + bool "I2C" > + depends on I2C=y > + default n > help > ACPI I2C enumeration support. > > -- > 1.8.4.rc3.2.g2c2b664