From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / hotplug: Remove containers synchronously
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:53:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130828185350.GB3471@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1883675.1ifF1KoWz3@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:51:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> The current protocol for handling hot remove of containers is very
> fragile and causes acpi_eject_store() to acquire acpi_scan_lock
> which may deadlock with the removal of the device that it is called
> for (the reason is that device sysfs attributes cannot be removed
> while their callbacks are being executed and ACPI device objects
> are removed under acpi_scan_lock).
>
> The problem is related to the fact that containers are handled by
> acpi_bus_device_eject() in a special way, which is to emit an
> offline uevent instead of just removing the container. Then, user
> space is expected to handle that uevent and use the container's
> "eject" attribute to actually remove it. That is fragile, because
> user space may fail to complete the ejection (for example, by not
> using the container's "eject" attribute at all) leaving the BIOS
> kind of in a limbo. Moreover, if the eject event is not signaled
> for a container itself, but for its parent device object (or
> generally, for an ancestor above it in the ACPI namespace), the
> container will be removed straight away without doing that whole
> dance.
>
> For this reason, modify acpi_bus_device_eject() to remove containers
> synchronously like any other objects (user space will get its uevent
> anyway in case it does some other things in response to it) and
> remove the eject_pending ACPI device flag that is not used any more.
> This way acpi_eject_store() doesn't have a reason to acquire
> acpi_scan_lock any more and one possible deadlock scenario goes
> away (plus the code is simplified a bit).
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-28 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-25 20:09 [PATCH] driver core / ACPI: Avoid device removal locking problems Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-25 21:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-26 3:13 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-26 12:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-26 14:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-26 15:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-27 3:26 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-27 9:21 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-27 18:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-27 21:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 10:03 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-28 12:24 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-28 13:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 13:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] driver core / ACPI: Avoid device hot remove locking issues Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 18:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-29 2:02 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / hotplug: Remove containers synchronously Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 18:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2013-08-29 2:02 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-28 17:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] driver core / ACPI: Avoid device removal locking problems Toshi Kani
2013-08-29 2:00 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-27 21:38 ` [PATCH] " Toshi Kani
2013-08-28 2:12 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-28 16:55 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-27 2:03 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-27 2:38 ` Gu Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130828185350.GB3471@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox