From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] DMI: Parse memory device (type 17) in SMBIOS Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:30:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20131014103053.GD4009@pd.tnic> References: <1381473166-29303-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <1381473166-29303-5-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <20131011154048.GH5925@pd.tnic> <20131014032113.GB12189@gchen.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:53672 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753797Ab3JNKbE (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 06:31:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131014032113.GB12189@gchen.bj.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Chen Gong Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:21:13PM -0400, Chen Gong wrote: > Yes, but we highly expect BIOS manufactors to make is valid and > complete. Well, you can always do sanity checks with FW_BUG noisy printks. I don't see any other way to move fw vendors - simply expecting them is not an incentive enough, IMO. :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --